37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 504510 |
Time | |
Date | 200103 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Weather Elements | Thunderstorm |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight ground : parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 270 flight time total : 16000 flight time type : 1130 |
ASRS Report | 504510 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe maintenance problem : improper documentation other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure contributing factor : manuals contributing factor : briefing performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : scheduled maintenance |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft Company |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
Aircraft maintenance logbook showed MEL 27-11, gust lock inoperative with an MEL extension to aircraft block hours of 4483 hours. However, the flight release also showed an MEL expiration date of mar/xa/01. [Flight date was 9 days later.] I called dispatch to confirm that the aircraft block hour extension was overriding. Dispatch and maintenance operations control confirmed this, but would not remove the expiration date (of 9 days ago). I was uncomfortable with the expiration date of mar/xa/01 on my release. I requested and received an ACARS printout confirming the flight was legal. 2 hours later, on my flight release for this aircraft's next flight, the expiration date had been changed to jul/xa/01. Why? On my next flight it had changed to apr/xa/01. Why? Were we legal or not? Our manuals do not address this situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN EMB145 PIC QUESTIONS THE CHANGING DATES OF THE EXTENDED MEL PERTAINING TO GUST LOCKS INOP ON HIS ACFT PRIOR TO FLT AND SUCCEEDING FLTS AT ZZZ, US.
Narrative: ACFT MAINT LOGBOOK SHOWED MEL 27-11, GUST LOCK INOP WITH AN MEL EXTENSION TO ACFT BLOCK HRS OF 4483 HRS. HOWEVER, THE FLT RELEASE ALSO SHOWED AN MEL EXPIRATION DATE OF MAR/XA/01. [FLT DATE WAS 9 DAYS LATER.] I CALLED DISPATCH TO CONFIRM THAT THE ACFT BLOCK HR EXTENSION WAS OVERRIDING. DISPATCH AND MAINT OPS CTL CONFIRMED THIS, BUT WOULD NOT REMOVE THE EXPIRATION DATE (OF 9 DAYS AGO). I WAS UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE EXPIRATION DATE OF MAR/XA/01 ON MY RELEASE. I REQUESTED AND RECEIVED AN ACARS PRINTOUT CONFIRMING THE FLT WAS LEGAL. 2 HRS LATER, ON MY FLT RELEASE FOR THIS ACFT'S NEXT FLT, THE EXPIRATION DATE HAD BEEN CHANGED TO JUL/XA/01. WHY? ON MY NEXT FLT IT HAD CHANGED TO APR/XA/01. WHY? WERE WE LEGAL OR NOT? OUR MANUALS DO NOT ADDRESS THIS SIT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.