 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
A CE560 PIC, PNF, allows his flight to proceed towards runway 25R when approach controller has assigned runway 25L as the visual landing runway at las, nv.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 504810 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200103 |
| Day | Thu |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : las.airport |
| State Reference | NV |
| Altitude | msl single value : 4000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : las.tower |
| Operator | general aviation : corporate |
| Make Model Name | Citation V |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 25r other |
| Flight Phase | descent : vacating altitude |
| Route In Use | approach : visual arrival : on vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : corporate |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 80 flight time total : 12000 flight time type : 1900 |
| ASRS Report | 504810 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : corporate |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance controller : issued advisory flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
| Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance Airport |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I was PNF. Initial contact with approach control, we were told to expect runway 25R. When switched over to tower for the visual approach, I thought we were cleared for a visual approach to runway 25R. Approach could have cleared us to runway 25L and I may have missed it, because on our initial contact to tower, I advised them we were on a visual approach for runway 25R. Tower queried when I announced runway 25R and told us to continue while they checked to see if runway 25R would work out. They came back and told us they needed us on runway 25L. We landed without incident. I should listen up more carefully at all times.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CE560 PIC, PNF, ALLOWS HIS FLT TO PROCEED TOWARDS RWY 25R WHEN APCH CTLR HAS ASSIGNED RWY 25L AS THE VISUAL LNDG RWY AT LAS, NV.
Narrative: I WAS PNF. INITIAL CONTACT WITH APCH CTL, WE WERE TOLD TO EXPECT RWY 25R. WHEN SWITCHED OVER TO TWR FOR THE VISUAL APCH, I THOUGHT WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 25R. APCH COULD HAVE CLRED US TO RWY 25L AND I MAY HAVE MISSED IT, BECAUSE ON OUR INITIAL CONTACT TO TWR, I ADVISED THEM WE WERE ON A VISUAL APCH FOR RWY 25R. TWR QUERIED WHEN I ANNOUNCED RWY 25R AND TOLD US TO CONTINUE WHILE THEY CHKED TO SEE IF RWY 25R WOULD WORK OUT. THEY CAME BACK AND TOLD US THEY NEEDED US ON RWY 25L. WE LANDED WITHOUT INCIDENT. I SHOULD LISTEN UP MORE CAREFULLY AT ALL TIMES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.