Narrative:

While performing job card xa-abcd there was some confusion at step 8, turbine frame -- oil supply tube wear check. In figure 95-119, item C, the wear direction seems incorrect. Even a severely worn guide bushing, if pushed in this direction, will pass the inspection criteria. The direction of wear in item C appears to contradict the other items in figure 95-119. The supply tube bushing that I inspected appeared severely worn. However, per the criteria in the job card, I returned the tube for continued service. I fear that actually, the tube may have been unsvcable. I asked the lead technician. He confirmed that per the job card, the tube was svcable.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: TECHNICIAN PERFORMING A CHK ON A CFM56 ENG, TURBINE SECTION, OIL SUPPLY TUBE WEAR CHK HAS SOME CONFUSION ON THE WEAR DIRECTION. THE JOB CARD HAS SOME CONTRADICTIONS.

Narrative: WHILE PERFORMING JOB CARD XA-ABCD THERE WAS SOME CONFUSION AT STEP 8, TURBINE FRAME -- OIL SUPPLY TUBE WEAR CHK. IN FIGURE 95-119, ITEM C, THE WEAR DIRECTION SEEMS INCORRECT. EVEN A SEVERELY WORN GUIDE BUSHING, IF PUSHED IN THIS DIRECTION, WILL PASS THE INSPECTION CRITERIA. THE DIRECTION OF WEAR IN ITEM C APPEARS TO CONTRADICT THE OTHER ITEMS IN FIGURE 95-119. THE SUPPLY TUBE BUSHING THAT I INSPECTED APPEARED SEVERELY WORN. HOWEVER, PER THE CRITERIA IN THE JOB CARD, I RETURNED THE TUBE FOR CONTINUED SVC. I FEAR THAT ACTUALLY, THE TUBE MAY HAVE BEEN UNSVCABLE. I ASKED THE LEAD TECHNICIAN. HE CONFIRMED THAT PER THE JOB CARD, THE TUBE WAS SVCABLE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.