Narrative:

Hanscom tower swamped with traffic on a good VFR day. Tower radar OTS. Tower sequenced my aircraft behind a piper tomahawk. I executed multiple s-turns to provide spacing. At the end of the day, I went ahead and landed. I have no idea if I was actually cleared to do so. Tower frequency so congested that I couldn't get a word in to ask. Aside from the obvious regulatory issue -- landing, taxi, etc, were accomplished without incident. Tower ought not to sequence relatively fast aircraft such as my M20R behind trainers and then ask them to drag the plane in with the stall horn on to accommodate their error. I figured that a go around would make things worse than simply landing. I was never concerned about being able to stop short of the tomahawk.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: M20R PLT WAS UNABLE TO COM WITH THE TWR BECAUSE OF FREQ CONGESTION SO HE LANDED WITHOUT CLRNC.

Narrative: HANSCOM TWR SWAMPED WITH TFC ON A GOOD VFR DAY. TWR RADAR OTS. TWR SEQUENCED MY ACFT BEHIND A PIPER TOMAHAWK. I EXECUTED MULTIPLE S-TURNS TO PROVIDE SPACING. AT THE END OF THE DAY, I WENT AHEAD AND LANDED. I HAVE NO IDEA IF I WAS ACTUALLY CLRED TO DO SO. TWR FREQ SO CONGESTED THAT I COULDN'T GET A WORD IN TO ASK. ASIDE FROM THE OBVIOUS REGULATORY ISSUE -- LNDG, TAXI, ETC, WERE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT INCIDENT. TWR OUGHT NOT TO SEQUENCE RELATIVELY FAST ACFT SUCH AS MY M20R BEHIND TRAINERS AND THEN ASK THEM TO DRAG THE PLANE IN WITH THE STALL HORN ON TO ACCOMMODATE THEIR ERROR. I FIGURED THAT A GAR WOULD MAKE THINGS WORSE THAN SIMPLY LNDG. I WAS NEVER CONCERNED ABOUT BEING ABLE TO STOP SHORT OF THE TOMAHAWK.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.