Narrative:

We were cleared from FBO to runway 21L via taxiway's C and a. Instructed to hold short of 21R. We missed the instruction, 'hold short of 21R at taxiway C.' the commercial airport diagram chart does not show the runway crossing taxiway C. Runway 21R ends north of taxiway C. Therefore we assumed the hold short reference was on taxiway a where it crosses 21R. Our crossing the extension of runway 21R at taxiway C did not create any hazard, but it could have. The airport should put better markings for that intersection, and the commercial chart should show the runway intersecting with taxiway C. The tower advised us that other professional crews have missed that intersection too. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated that the aircraft was a lear 45 operated by a corporation under part 91 rules. He stated that he and the captain fly in to the luk airport on occasion, but this was the first time for the taxi routing given to them that day for taxi out. He stated that they had no idea that the tower controller meant for them to hold short of runway 21 extension on taxiway C since the runway was not shown to intersect that taxiway as it did on taxiway a. Therefore, they were surprised when the controller advised them of passing their hold short point. They do not remember noticing any hold short marks, or signs for runway 3L, which is the intersection on taxiway C where they had just passed. However, the other end of runway 3L, which is 21R, was one of the active runways. After giving thought to their mistake, they did not remember the exact wording of their clearance by the controller. However, he did remember the controller stating that they were not the first ones to make this mistake.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CPR JET FLT CREW FAILED TO STOP AT RWY HOLD SHORT LINE AS INSTRUCTED BY THE LUK GND CTLR DUE TO LACK OF MARKINGS FOR HOLD SHORT ON TXWY C ON WHICH THEY WERE TAXIING.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED FROM FBO TO RWY 21L VIA TXWY'S C AND A. INSTRUCTED TO HOLD SHORT OF 21R. WE MISSED THE INSTRUCTION, 'HOLD SHORT OF 21R AT TXWY C.' THE COMMERCIAL ARPT DIAGRAM CHART DOES NOT SHOW THE RWY CROSSING TXWY C. RWY 21R ENDS N OF TXWY C. THEREFORE WE ASSUMED THE HOLD SHORT REFERENCE WAS ON TXWY A WHERE IT CROSSES 21R. OUR XING THE EXTENSION OF RWY 21R AT TXWY C DID NOT CREATE ANY HAZARD, BUT IT COULD HAVE. THE ARPT SHOULD PUT BETTER MARKINGS FOR THAT INTXN, AND THE COMMERCIAL CHART SHOULD SHOW THE RWY INTERSECTING WITH TXWY C. THE TWR ADVISED US THAT OTHER PROFESSIONAL CREWS HAVE MISSED THAT INTXN TOO. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATED THAT THE ACFT WAS A LEAR 45 OPERATED BY A CORPORATION UNDER PART 91 RULES. HE STATED THAT HE AND THE CAPT FLY IN TO THE LUK ARPT ON OCCASION, BUT THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME FOR THE TAXI ROUTING GIVEN TO THEM THAT DAY FOR TAXI OUT. HE STATED THAT THEY HAD NO IDEA THAT THE TWR CTLR MEANT FOR THEM TO HOLD SHORT OF RWY 21 EXTENSION ON TXWY C SINCE THE RWY WAS NOT SHOWN TO INTERSECT THAT TXWY AS IT DID ON TXWY A. THEREFORE, THEY WERE SURPRISED WHEN THE CTLR ADVISED THEM OF PASSING THEIR HOLD SHORT POINT. THEY DO NOT REMEMBER NOTICING ANY HOLD SHORT MARKS, OR SIGNS FOR RWY 3L, WHICH IS THE INTXN ON TXWY C WHERE THEY HAD JUST PASSED. HOWEVER, THE OTHER END OF RWY 3L, WHICH IS 21R, WAS ONE OF THE ACTIVE RWYS. AFTER GIVING THOUGHT TO THEIR MISTAKE, THEY DID NOT REMEMBER THE EXACT WORDING OF THEIR CLRNC BY THE CTLR. HOWEVER, HE DID REMEMBER THE CTLR STATING THAT THEY WERE NOT THE FIRST ONES TO MAKE THIS MISTAKE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.