Narrative:

Aircraft arrived at gate with write-up. The write-up was for inoperative ACARS. Maintenance deferred ACARS. All logbook paperwork completed correctly. The captain arrived to the aircraft late. I informed him of the write-up and he acknowledged. We performed necessary checklists and left. Pushback, taxi, takeoff, and climb out were routine. At the top of climb, the captain noticed the MEL had not been added to the release. The captain called operations to get a pen and ink change for an amended release. Operations said since we were airborne, they could not do that. We added the MEL to the release with the appropriate information that we had. Once arriving at our destination, we called maintenance to make sure the deferral was in the computer. There was a communication failure on the part of several people, including the flight crew, that allowed the flight to depart with incomplete paperwork. A different system that eliminates long lines of communication and that can handle deferred items in a more timely manner needs to be developed. Furthermore, crew communication could have more completely addressed the problem had we had time to discuss it as part of our preflight brief.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737 FLT CREW DEPARTED WITH AN MEL THAT WAS NOT LISTED ON THE RELEASE.

Narrative: ACFT ARRIVED AT GATE WITH WRITE-UP. THE WRITE-UP WAS FOR INOP ACARS. MAINT DEFERRED ACARS. ALL LOGBOOK PAPERWORK COMPLETED CORRECTLY. THE CAPT ARRIVED TO THE ACFT LATE. I INFORMED HIM OF THE WRITE-UP AND HE ACKNOWLEDGED. WE PERFORMED NECESSARY CHKLISTS AND LEFT. PUSHBACK, TAXI, TKOF, AND CLBOUT WERE ROUTINE. AT THE TOP OF CLB, THE CAPT NOTICED THE MEL HAD NOT BEEN ADDED TO THE RELEASE. THE CAPT CALLED OPS TO GET A PEN AND INK CHANGE FOR AN AMENDED RELEASE. OPS SAID SINCE WE WERE AIRBORNE, THEY COULD NOT DO THAT. WE ADDED THE MEL TO THE RELEASE WITH THE APPROPRIATE INFO THAT WE HAD. ONCE ARRIVING AT OUR DEST, WE CALLED MAINT TO MAKE SURE THE DEFERRAL WAS IN THE COMPUTER. THERE WAS A COM FAILURE ON THE PART OF SEVERAL PEOPLE, INCLUDING THE FLT CREW, THAT ALLOWED THE FLT TO DEPART WITH INCOMPLETE PAPERWORK. A DIFFERENT SYS THAT ELIMINATES LONG LINES OF COM AND THAT CAN HANDLE DEFERRED ITEMS IN A MORE TIMELY MANNER NEEDS TO BE DEVELOPED. FURTHERMORE, CREW COM COULD HAVE MORE COMPLETELY ADDRESSED THE PROB HAD WE HAD TIME TO DISCUSS IT AS PART OF OUR PREFLT BRIEF.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.