Narrative:

While conducting a flight review for a private pilot in his PA28R-201 arrow iv, the last landing resulted in a gear-up approach and landing. There was no warning that the gear was not extended. No warning horn, light. The safety extension system did not activate. The flight departed zzv at XA15 local time. We proceeded to do air work, diverted to I71 for a landing and takeoff. We returned to zzv. After doing a touch-and-go, the pilot decided to do 1 more landing. We switched to runway 34 to reduce the amount of sun in our eyes since it was right at sunset. The one area the pilot mentioned he was having trouble with, was coming in too high and fast. The final landing approach focused on proper airspeed, power, descent rate (ie, a stabilized approach). The approach was near prefect in this respect, but resulted in my not noticing the pilot had not lowered the gear. My attention was focused on the approach. There were no injuries, and the plane only sustained minor belly and propeller damage. The plane came to rest on the runway edge. I believe that my focus on stabilized approach parameters and continual verbal feedback to the pilot diverted my attention long enough to not detect the gear-up condition. This was my first flight in this aircraft, with this pilot, and thus was not familiar with the aircraft's feel when the gear was not deployed. The low sun made seeing in the cabin difficult as well.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A PA28-201 CFI AND PLT OWNER LAND THE ACFT GEAR UP AT ZZV, OH.

Narrative: WHILE CONDUCTING A FLT REVIEW FOR A PVT PLT IN HIS PA28R-201 ARROW IV, THE LAST LNDG RESULTED IN A GEAR-UP APCH AND LNDG. THERE WAS NO WARNING THAT THE GEAR WAS NOT EXTENDED. NO WARNING HORN, LIGHT. THE SAFETY EXTENSION SYS DID NOT ACTIVATE. THE FLT DEPARTED ZZV AT XA15 LCL TIME. WE PROCEEDED TO DO AIR WORK, DIVERTED TO I71 FOR A LNDG AND TKOF. WE RETURNED TO ZZV. AFTER DOING A TOUCH-AND-GO, THE PLT DECIDED TO DO 1 MORE LNDG. WE SWITCHED TO RWY 34 TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF SUN IN OUR EYES SINCE IT WAS RIGHT AT SUNSET. THE ONE AREA THE PLT MENTIONED HE WAS HAVING TROUBLE WITH, WAS COMING IN TOO HIGH AND FAST. THE FINAL LNDG APCH FOCUSED ON PROPER AIRSPD, PWR, DSCNT RATE (IE, A STABILIZED APCH). THE APCH WAS NEAR PREFECT IN THIS RESPECT, BUT RESULTED IN MY NOT NOTICING THE PLT HAD NOT LOWERED THE GEAR. MY ATTN WAS FOCUSED ON THE APCH. THERE WERE NO INJURIES, AND THE PLANE ONLY SUSTAINED MINOR BELLY AND PROP DAMAGE. THE PLANE CAME TO REST ON THE RWY EDGE. I BELIEVE THAT MY FOCUS ON STABILIZED APCH PARAMETERS AND CONTINUAL VERBAL FEEDBACK TO THE PLT DIVERTED MY ATTN LONG ENOUGH TO NOT DETECT THE GEAR-UP CONDITION. THIS WAS MY FIRST FLT IN THIS ACFT, WITH THIS PLT, AND THUS WAS NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE ACFT'S FEEL WHEN THE GEAR WAS NOT DEPLOYED. THE LOW SUN MADE SEEING IN THE CABIN DIFFICULT AS WELL.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.