Narrative:

The clearance given by phl approach control is improper for the published ILS runway 27R at phl. We were vectored to final at 4000 ft. When given a turn to final, we were cleared to maintain 4000 ft until established on the localizer, clear ILS runway 27R. However, when viewing the published ILS runway 27R, the first officer and I see no legal way to descend out of 4000 ft until the OM at speez. This is due to the holding pattern which is integral to the approach. When vectored for a straight-in, how do we know we are within 1 mi of speez and are established on the approach and therefore legal to descend to 2100 ft? I called the FAA facility after landing and they saw no problem with the clearance.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737 FLC QUESTION PHL RWY 27R ILS APCH PROC.

Narrative: THE CLRNC GIVEN BY PHL APCH CTL IS IMPROPER FOR THE PUBLISHED ILS RWY 27R AT PHL. WE WERE VECTORED TO FINAL AT 4000 FT. WHEN GIVEN A TURN TO FINAL, WE WERE CLRED TO MAINTAIN 4000 FT UNTIL ESTABLISHED ON THE LOC, CLR ILS RWY 27R. HOWEVER, WHEN VIEWING THE PUBLISHED ILS RWY 27R, THE FO AND I SEE NO LEGAL WAY TO DSND OUT OF 4000 FT UNTIL THE OM AT SPEEZ. THIS IS DUE TO THE HOLDING PATTERN WHICH IS INTEGRAL TO THE APCH. WHEN VECTORED FOR A STRAIGHT-IN, HOW DO WE KNOW WE ARE WITHIN 1 MI OF SPEEZ AND ARE ESTABLISHED ON THE APCH AND THEREFORE LEGAL TO DSND TO 2100 FT? I CALLED THE FAA FACILITY AFTER LNDG AND THEY SAW NO PROB WITH THE CLRNC.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.