Narrative:

While being vectored to ILS approach runway 34R, approach told us RVR was better for runway 35. We accepted runway 35 and was vectored to base turn. I pulled out the approach plate for runway 35 and changed the inbound course. I was sidetracked by more vectors, and checklists and failed to change frequency's to ILS runway 35 and we intercepted runway 34R localizer. ATC noticed but didn't say anything until missed approach. We then corrected and landed from the ILS to runway 35. No traffic conflict as it was late at night. Light traffic in the area.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: F27 FO FAILED TO CHANGE THE RWY ILS FREQ AFTER BEING CLRED FOR DIFFERENT ILS APCH THAN ORIGINALLY EXPECTED RESULTING IN A MISS APCH.

Narrative: WHILE BEING VECTORED TO ILS APCH RWY 34R, APCH TOLD US RVR WAS BETTER FOR RWY 35. WE ACCEPTED RWY 35 AND WAS VECTORED TO BASE TURN. I PULLED OUT THE APCH PLATE FOR RWY 35 AND CHANGED THE INBOUND COURSE. I WAS SIDETRACKED BY MORE VECTORS, AND CHKLISTS AND FAILED TO CHANGE FREQ'S TO ILS RWY 35 AND WE INTERCEPTED RWY 34R LOCALIZER. ATC NOTICED BUT DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING UNTIL MISSED APCH. WE THEN CORRECTED AND LANDED FROM THE ILS TO RWY 35. NO TFC CONFLICT AS IT WAS LATE AT NIGHT. LIGHT TFC IN THE AREA.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.