37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 537507 |
Time | |
Date | 200202 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ilm.airport |
State Reference | NC |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 1200 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Marginal |
Weather Elements | Rain Turbulence |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zdc.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 35 other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 22000 flight time type : 2500 |
ASRS Report | 537507 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather inflight encounter : turbulence non adherence : company policies non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Weather Flight Crew Human Performance Company Airport |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
WX was reported good VFR as center vectored us to the ilm airport (tower closed). We were unable to see the ground, at which time we were vectored to the ILS approach to runway 35, which we intercepted. We activated the pilot controled lighting which we had in sight at about 1200 ft AGL. Visibility was approximately 3 mi. Papis and MALSR lights were working. It was not until we were rolling out on runway 35 that we noticed the runway lights were not on. By the time we noticed they were not lit, we were in reverse and stopping on a wet runway. We continued the landing as the safest option available to us at the time. Factors to consider were the lowering visibility, turbulence, moderate rain, and pilot fatigue (long day). Also, there was no instrument approach for the other runway. The company operations page states that runway lights are on continuously, based on WX conditions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-300 FLC LANDS AT A CLOSED ATCT ARPT WITHOUT HIRL DURING AN ILS APCH TO RWY 35 AT ILM, NC.
Narrative: WX WAS RPTED GOOD VFR AS CTR VECTORED US TO THE ILM ARPT (TWR CLOSED). WE WERE UNABLE TO SEE THE GND, AT WHICH TIME WE WERE VECTORED TO THE ILS APCH TO RWY 35, WHICH WE INTERCEPTED. WE ACTIVATED THE PLT CTLED LIGHTING WHICH WE HAD IN SIGHT AT ABOUT 1200 FT AGL. VISIBILITY WAS APPROX 3 MI. PAPIS AND MALSR LIGHTS WERE WORKING. IT WAS NOT UNTIL WE WERE ROLLING OUT ON RWY 35 THAT WE NOTICED THE RWY LIGHTS WERE NOT ON. BY THE TIME WE NOTICED THEY WERE NOT LIT, WE WERE IN REVERSE AND STOPPING ON A WET RWY. WE CONTINUED THE LNDG AS THE SAFEST OPTION AVAILABLE TO US AT THE TIME. FACTORS TO CONSIDER WERE THE LOWERING VISIBILITY, TURB, MODERATE RAIN, AND PLT FATIGUE (LONG DAY). ALSO, THERE WAS NO INST APCH FOR THE OTHER RWY. THE COMPANY OPS PAGE STATES THAT RWY LIGHTS ARE ON CONTINUOUSLY, BASED ON WX CONDITIONS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.