37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 538795 |
Time | |
Date | 200202 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : bld.vortac |
State Reference | NV |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 15000 msl bound upper : 16000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zla.artcc tower : phx.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Brasilia EMB-120 All Series |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zla.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 225 flight time total : 10300 flight time type : 6500 |
ASRS Report | 538795 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 3000 flight time type : 1400 |
ASRS Report | 538964 |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude non adherence : clearance other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : radar other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance controller : issued alert |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
We were climbing out of las sebound, and our call sign was air carrier xayy. Our clearance was to climb and maintain 15000 ft. Then air carrier xyy came on frequency. I was trying to be careful about the similar flight numbers. I thought the controller gave us a clearance to FL220, so I read it back with our flight number. As we passed through 16000 ft, the controller told us to level at 17000 ft, and that we had accepted a clearance intended for air carrier xyy. My first officer and I both thought we heard our flight number with the clearance. I clearly used our number with the readback, and the controller never questioned my readback. There was no danger, no loss of separation. But if I made an error in answering the wrong clearance, the controller should have caught my error in the readback. In this situation, both the crew and the controller need to be responsible for errors. If I screw up, the controller should catch the error, and vice versa.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EMB120 FLC ACKNOWLEDGED AND RESPONDED TO CLRNC MEANT FOR ANOTHER ACFT WITH A SIMILAR CALL SIGN.
Narrative: WE WERE CLBING OUT OF LAS SEBOUND, AND OUR CALL SIGN WAS ACR XAYY. OUR CLRNC WAS TO CLB AND MAINTAIN 15000 FT. THEN ACR XYY CAME ON FREQ. I WAS TRYING TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT THE SIMILAR FLT NUMBERS. I THOUGHT THE CTLR GAVE US A CLRNC TO FL220, SO I READ IT BACK WITH OUR FLT NUMBER. AS WE PASSED THROUGH 16000 FT, THE CTLR TOLD US TO LEVEL AT 17000 FT, AND THAT WE HAD ACCEPTED A CLRNC INTENDED FOR ACR XYY. MY FO AND I BOTH THOUGHT WE HEARD OUR FLT NUMBER WITH THE CLRNC. I CLRLY USED OUR NUMBER WITH THE READBACK, AND THE CTLR NEVER QUESTIONED MY READBACK. THERE WAS NO DANGER, NO LOSS OF SEPARATION. BUT IF I MADE AN ERROR IN ANSWERING THE WRONG CLRNC, THE CTLR SHOULD HAVE CAUGHT MY ERROR IN THE READBACK. IN THIS SIT, BOTH THE CREW AND THE CTLR NEED TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS. IF I SCREW UP, THE CTLR SHOULD CATCH THE ERROR, AND VICE VERSA.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.