37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 540085 |
Time | |
Date | 200203 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : cyqb.airport |
State Reference | PQ |
Altitude | msl single value : 10000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 36 flight time total : 4000 flight time type : 35 |
ASRS Report | 540085 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far non adherence : company policies |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
ATIS reported WX at 3/4 SM for the ILS in use. WX minimums for the ILS are 1/2 SM. On the approach, we saw the approach lights and runway at 300-400 ft AGL. Several mins after landing, I realized that as a new PIC with less than 100 hours in the aircraft, I forgot to apply higher minimums to the approach. The requirement to add 1/2 SM made the minimums for the approach 1 SM. I was actually 1/4 SM below approach minimums. A few factors contributed to not remembering to apply the higher minimums. These factors can be reduced to a poor use of available resources, a high cockpit workload, being too comfortable with forecasted and current WX, a lack of experience with the high minimum requirement. In retrospect, a more effective use of resources would have given both the PF and PNF a better opportunity to recall the higher minimum requirement. I could have used many other resources to get the current WX instead of waiting for ATIS during the final stage of arrival.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN E145 RESTR CAPT MADE AN APCH TO AND LANDED BELOW HIS RESTR MINIMUMS.
Narrative: ATIS RPTED WX AT 3/4 SM FOR THE ILS IN USE. WX MINIMUMS FOR THE ILS ARE 1/2 SM. ON THE APCH, WE SAW THE APCH LIGHTS AND RWY AT 300-400 FT AGL. SEVERAL MINS AFTER LNDG, I REALIZED THAT AS A NEW PIC WITH LESS THAN 100 HRS IN THE ACFT, I FORGOT TO APPLY HIGHER MINIMUMS TO THE APCH. THE REQUIREMENT TO ADD 1/2 SM MADE THE MINIMUMS FOR THE APCH 1 SM. I WAS ACTUALLY 1/4 SM BELOW APCH MINIMUMS. A FEW FACTORS CONTRIBUTED TO NOT REMEMBERING TO APPLY THE HIGHER MINIMUMS. THESE FACTORS CAN BE REDUCED TO A POOR USE OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES, A HIGH COCKPIT WORKLOAD, BEING TOO COMFORTABLE WITH FORECASTED AND CURRENT WX, A LACK OF EXPERIENCE WITH THE HIGH MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. IN RETROSPECT, A MORE EFFECTIVE USE OF RESOURCES WOULD HAVE GIVEN BOTH THE PF AND PNF A BETTER OPPORTUNITY TO RECALL THE HIGHER MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. I COULD HAVE USED MANY OTHER RESOURCES TO GET THE CURRENT WX INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR ATIS DURING THE FINAL STAGE OF ARR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.