37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 540639 |
Time | |
Date | 200203 |
Day | Sat |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | other personnel other |
ASRS Report | 540639 |
Person 2 | |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe maintenance problem : improper maintenance maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other other : person 2 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : repair performance deficiency : scheduled maintenance performance deficiency : inspection |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
On or about mar/xa/02, my other mechanic, mr. X, noticed while performing a tire change that it appeared that the airplane had flown past a required 100 hour inspection. This airplane is used in flight training and rental and some personal use. I told mr X that I recalled having performed an inspection in either late january or early february prior to that time, but couldn't recall the date or hours, and I would locate that form where the work was completed. My forms were in disarray and not in the normal place adjacent my desk, as several persons, including mr X, have been going through my desk and files while I was out of town and not putting back documents where they got them.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A C172 WAS DISPATCHED AND OPERATED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH THE 100 HR INSPECTION OVERTIME AND NO RECORDS TO SUPPORT PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
Narrative: ON OR ABOUT MAR/XA/02, MY OTHER MECH, MR. X, NOTICED WHILE PERFORMING A TIRE CHANGE THAT IT APPEARED THAT THE AIRPLANE HAD FLOWN PAST A REQUIRED 100 HR INSPECTION. THIS AIRPLANE IS USED IN FLT TRAINING AND RENTAL AND SOME PERSONAL USE. I TOLD MR X THAT I RECALLED HAVING PERFORMED AN INSPECTION IN EITHER LATE JANUARY OR EARLY FEBRUARY PRIOR TO THAT TIME, BUT COULDN'T RECALL THE DATE OR HRS, AND I WOULD LOCATE THAT FORM WHERE THE WORK WAS COMPLETED. MY FORMS WERE IN DISARRAY AND NOT IN THE NORMAL PLACE ADJACENT MY DESK, AS SEVERAL PERSONS, INCLUDING MR X, HAVE BEEN GOING THROUGH MY DESK AND FILES WHILE I WAS OUT OF TOWN AND NOT PUTTING BACK DOCUMENTS WHERE THEY GOT THEM.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.