Narrative:

We were on a downwind descending to 3000 ft, vector for runway 32 at srq. Our clearance was, 'heading 160 degrees and 3000 ft.' approach asked if we had the airport in sight. We said yes. He said 'set yourself up for a downwind to runway 32. There is traffic departing to the northeast, I'll call him out to you.' I thought he had cleared us for the visual, so I turned toward the airport and set 1600 ft in the altitude window for downwind. Approaching 3000 ft, I became concerned that maybe he hadn't actually cleared us for the visual, so I hit altitude hold approaching 3000 ft. We descended slightly through 3000 ft, maybe 2750 ft. At the same time we got an RA to pull up, so I did. The rest of the flight was uneventful. My belief is that non standard terminology from approach control led me to my mistake in thinking we were cleared for a visual approach to runway 32.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ALTDEV AND POTENTIAL CONFLICT WHEN THE FO, PF, OF A B757 PLANS ON LEAVING HIS ASSIGNED ALT THINKING HE HAD CLRNC FOR A VISUAL APCH INTO SRQ, FL.

Narrative: WE WERE ON A DOWNWIND DSNDING TO 3000 FT, VECTOR FOR RWY 32 AT SRQ. OUR CLRNC WAS, 'HEADING 160 DEGS AND 3000 FT.' APCH ASKED IF WE HAD THE ARPT IN SIGHT. WE SAID YES. HE SAID 'SET YOURSELF UP FOR A DOWNWIND TO RWY 32. THERE IS TFC DEPARTING TO THE NE, I'LL CALL HIM OUT TO YOU.' I THOUGHT HE HAD CLRED US FOR THE VISUAL, SO I TURNED TOWARD THE ARPT AND SET 1600 FT IN THE ALT WINDOW FOR DOWNWIND. APCHING 3000 FT, I BECAME CONCERNED THAT MAYBE HE HADN'T ACTUALLY CLRED US FOR THE VISUAL, SO I HIT ALT HOLD APCHING 3000 FT. WE DSNDED SLIGHTLY THROUGH 3000 FT, MAYBE 2750 FT. AT THE SAME TIME WE GOT AN RA TO PULL UP, SO I DID. THE REST OF THE FLT WAS UNEVENTFUL. MY BELIEF IS THAT NON STANDARD TERMINOLOGY FROM APCH CTL LED ME TO MY MISTAKE IN THINKING WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 32.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.