37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 544936 |
Time | |
Date | 200204 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mlb.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | agl single value : 100 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mlb.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | landing : go around |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mlb.tower |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller non radar : 34 controller radar : 2 |
ASRS Report | 544936 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : executed go around |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 400 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I was working local control. Aircraft #2 (VFR) called for landing instructions. I was busy talking to numerous other aircraft both in touch-and-go pattern and inbound. Aircraft #2 was a student from another airport north of melbourne. This pilot spoke broken english, and was impossible to understand. I had him identify for a position report. It took me approximately 15 mins to get him to the airport. I was using runway 27L and runway 27R. He was finally located but would not follow control instructions and turned final to runway 9L with traffic departing runway 27R head-on. I turned him to the north and then to a right base to runway 27R. Approach control vectored an MD80 to runway 27L for a visual approach. Aircraft #2 turned final to runway 27R. Aircraft #1 turned final to runway 27L. On a 1/4 mi final to runway 27R, aircraft #2 made a left turn in front of aircraft #1. I immediately sent aircraft #1 around. Separation was at best 100 ft between both aircraft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: STUDENT PLT WITH A LANGUAGE PROB INBOUND TO MLB REQUIRES EXTRA HANDLING BUT ABRUPTLY TURNS IN FRONT OF AN MD80 ON SHORT FINAL CAUSING THE ACR TO GO AROUND.
Narrative: I WAS WORKING LCL CTL. ACFT #2 (VFR) CALLED FOR LNDG INSTRUCTIONS. I WAS BUSY TALKING TO NUMEROUS OTHER ACFT BOTH IN TOUCH-AND-GO PATTERN AND INBOUND. ACFT #2 WAS A STUDENT FROM ANOTHER ARPT N OF MELBOURNE. THIS PLT SPOKE BROKEN ENGLISH, AND WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND. I HAD HIM IDENT FOR A POS RPT. IT TOOK ME APPROX 15 MINS TO GET HIM TO THE ARPT. I WAS USING RWY 27L AND RWY 27R. HE WAS FINALLY LOCATED BUT WOULD NOT FOLLOW CTL INSTRUCTIONS AND TURNED FINAL TO RWY 9L WITH TFC DEPARTING RWY 27R HEAD-ON. I TURNED HIM TO THE N AND THEN TO A R BASE TO RWY 27R. APCH CTL VECTORED AN MD80 TO RWY 27L FOR A VISUAL APCH. ACFT #2 TURNED FINAL TO RWY 27R. ACFT #1 TURNED FINAL TO RWY 27L. ON A 1/4 MI FINAL TO RWY 27R, ACFT #2 MADE A L TURN IN FRONT OF ACFT #1. I IMMEDIATELY SENT ACFT #1 AROUND. SEPARATION WAS AT BEST 100 FT BTWN BOTH ACFT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.