A PA44 instructor and student landed at dvt prior to preceding aircraft clearing the runway.

Attributes
ACN	546343
Time
Date	200205
Day	Mon
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : dvt.airport
State Reference	AZ
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	general aviation : instructional
Make Model Name	PA-44 Seminole Turbo Seminole
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	landing : roll
Flight Plan	VFR
Aircraft 2
Controlling Facilities	tower : dvt.tower
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Cessna Single Piston Undifferentiated or Other Model
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	ground : taxi
Flight Plan	VFR
Person 1
Affiliation	other
Function	instruction : instructor
Qualification	pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 300 flight time total : 1100 flight time type : 300
ASRS Report	546343
Person 2
Affiliation	other
Function	flight crew : single pilot instruction : trainee
Events
Anomaly	incursion : runway non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other flight crewa other flight crewb
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Miss Distance	horizontal : 3250
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

I was on mei training flight as the CFI. Student had simulated single engine with simulated gear failure. Upon landing, we looked to far end of runway and watched cessna taxi off runway onto taxiway. Cessna clearly on runway still exiting as we began braking. Runway 4500 ft. We were approximately 500 ft down approach end. Cessna exiting about 500 ft from departure end. We are not 100% positive that a go around was not issued by tower. Tower said nothing and ground said nothing. Maybe no rule was broken. I have heard tower allow lndgs when aircraft separation would be at least 3000 ft. Usually tower verified clear to land, separation enough. Not this time. Contributing factors were me instructing student with 2 failures and high workload. We had been cleared to land during downwind.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A PA44 INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT LANDED AT DVT PRIOR TO PRECEDING ACFT CLRING THE RWY.

Narrative: I WAS ON MEI TRAINING FLT AS THE CFI. STUDENT HAD SIMULATED SINGLE ENG WITH SIMULATED GEAR FAILURE. UPON LNDG, WE LOOKED TO FAR END OF RWY AND WATCHED CESSNA TAXI OFF RWY ONTO TXWY. CESSNA CLRLY ON RWY STILL EXITING AS WE BEGAN BRAKING. RWY 4500 FT. WE WERE APPROX 500 FT DOWN APCH END. CESSNA EXITING ABOUT 500 FT FROM DEP END. WE ARE NOT 100% POSITIVE THAT A GAR WAS NOT ISSUED BY TWR. TWR SAID NOTHING AND GND SAID NOTHING. MAYBE NO RULE WAS BROKEN. I HAVE HEARD TWR ALLOW LNDGS WHEN ACFT SEPARATION WOULD BE AT LEAST 3000 FT. USUALLY TWR VERIFIED CLR TO LAND, SEPARATION ENOUGH. NOT THIS TIME. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS WERE ME INSTRUCTING STUDENT WITH 2 FAILURES AND HIGH WORKLOAD. WE HAD BEEN CLRED TO LAND DURING DOWNWIND.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.