37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 552548 |
Time | |
Date | 200206 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : cps.airport |
State Reference | IL |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : cps.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | MU-2 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : roll |
Route In Use | approach : straight in |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : t75.tracon tower : cps.tower |
Make Model Name | Hawker Horizon (Raytheon) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : holding ground : taxi |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : flight engineer pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : multi engine |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 160 flight time total : 6300 flight time type : 790 |
ASRS Report | 552548 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : ground critical ground encounters other incursion : runway non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 3500 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Airport |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
On the morning of jun/tue/02 at approximately XA40, I was vectored by st louis approach control 123.7 stl to cps airport. With no reported traffic in the area, I canceled my instrument flight plan with stl approach once I idented cps, and changed to advisory frequency 120.9 CTAF, which becomes the tower frequency at XB00. On CTAF, I reported a 3 mi base leg to runway 30L, 1 mi base leg to runway 30L, base to final runway 30L, and landing runway 30L. As I touched down on runway 30L at approximately XA45, and pulled the power levers into beta range, a hawker partially pulled out onto runway 12R from taxiway D. I initiated maximum reverse and maximum breaking and turned off the runway onto taxiway K, while the hawker pulled completely onto runway 12R facing me. The hawker was not monitoring CTAF, and the hawker had no landing lights, or strobe lights on. After landing, I taxied to parking, and tendered my cargo to the courier. The hawker remained parked on the departure end of runway 12R with no lights on for 15 mins, and departed at XB00. Once the cps tower opened, I contacted the tower on 120.9 to get a radio check, to insure my radios were working. Once the radio check was satisfactory, I asked the tower personnel if they had seen what had transpired, and they had. I asked why the crew of the hawker was not monitoring CTAF, and the tower personnel called stl to find out. The cps tower personnel said that the hawker crew was monitoring and in contact with stl clearance delivery on 121.8, cps ground control frequency during normal hours of operation. This runway incursion could have been prevented by the proper use of monitoring and aircraft position reports on CTAF by the hawker crew. Additionally, the hawker should not have remained parked on an active runway for 15 mins. Had I not canceled my instrument flight plan until on the ground, this incursion may have been prevented, if the hawker crew was monitoring stl approach control on 123.7. If the hawker crew monitored stl approach control, they would have known that I was cleared for a visual approach to cps runway 30L.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: RWY INCURSION BY A TAXIING HAWKER CPR JET WAS A LEVEL OF CONCERN BY THE PLT OF AN MU2 CARGO FLT LNDG AT CPS, IL.
Narrative: ON THE MORNING OF JUN/TUE/02 AT APPROX XA40, I WAS VECTORED BY ST LOUIS APCH CTL 123.7 STL TO CPS ARPT. WITH NO RPTED TFC IN THE AREA, I CANCELED MY INST FLT PLAN WITH STL APCH ONCE I IDENTED CPS, AND CHANGED TO ADVISORY FREQ 120.9 CTAF, WHICH BECOMES THE TWR FREQ AT XB00. ON CTAF, I RPTED A 3 MI BASE LEG TO RWY 30L, 1 MI BASE LEG TO RWY 30L, BASE TO FINAL RWY 30L, AND LNDG RWY 30L. AS I TOUCHED DOWN ON RWY 30L AT APPROX XA45, AND PULLED THE PWR LEVERS INTO BETA RANGE, A HAWKER PARTIALLY PULLED OUT ONTO RWY 12R FROM TXWY D. I INITIATED MAX REVERSE AND MAX BREAKING AND TURNED OFF THE RWY ONTO TXWY K, WHILE THE HAWKER PULLED COMPLETELY ONTO RWY 12R FACING ME. THE HAWKER WAS NOT MONITORING CTAF, AND THE HAWKER HAD NO LNDG LIGHTS, OR STROBE LIGHTS ON. AFTER LNDG, I TAXIED TO PARKING, AND TENDERED MY CARGO TO THE COURIER. THE HAWKER REMAINED PARKED ON THE DEP END OF RWY 12R WITH NO LIGHTS ON FOR 15 MINS, AND DEPARTED AT XB00. ONCE THE CPS TWR OPENED, I CONTACTED THE TWR ON 120.9 TO GET A RADIO CHK, TO INSURE MY RADIOS WERE WORKING. ONCE THE RADIO CHK WAS SATISFACTORY, I ASKED THE TWR PERSONNEL IF THEY HAD SEEN WHAT HAD TRANSPIRED, AND THEY HAD. I ASKED WHY THE CREW OF THE HAWKER WAS NOT MONITORING CTAF, AND THE TWR PERSONNEL CALLED STL TO FIND OUT. THE CPS TWR PERSONNEL SAID THAT THE HAWKER CREW WAS MONITORING AND IN CONTACT WITH STL CLRNC DELIVERY ON 121.8, CPS GND CTL FREQ DURING NORMAL HRS OF OP. THIS RWY INCURSION COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED BY THE PROPER USE OF MONITORING AND ACFT POS RPTS ON CTAF BY THE HAWKER CREW. ADDITIONALLY, THE HAWKER SHOULD NOT HAVE REMAINED PARKED ON AN ACTIVE RWY FOR 15 MINS. HAD I NOT CANCELED MY INST FLT PLAN UNTIL ON THE GND, THIS INCURSION MAY HAVE BEEN PREVENTED, IF THE HAWKER CREW WAS MONITORING STL APCH CTL ON 123.7. IF THE HAWKER CREW MONITORED STL APCH CTL, THEY WOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT I WAS CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO CPS RWY 30L.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.