Narrative:

While descending into las, approach told us to descend to and maintain 10000 ft via the lynsy arrival. The first fix was lynsy and the altitude was 12000 ft because we were told to descend to a hard altitude of 10000 ft. It was my understanding that 10000 ft was the altitude they (las approach) wanted us at. When level at 10000 ft, las approach asked us what altitude we were at and what we were assigned. We responded with the above, and were given a phone number to call when we landed. At no time were any aircraft in our area. We called and explained to approach what we thought the clearance meant, and they said there would be no action against us, that they wanted to straighten this out to avoid future deviations. I think ATC could have been clrer and more concise by stating descend to lynsy at 12000 ft, and then descend and maintain 10000 ft.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737-300 FLC HAS ALTDEV DURING PUBLISHED ARR TO LAS.

Narrative: WHILE DSNDING INTO LAS, APCH TOLD US TO DSND TO AND MAINTAIN 10000 FT VIA THE LYNSY ARR. THE FIRST FIX WAS LYNSY AND THE ALT WAS 12000 FT BECAUSE WE WERE TOLD TO DSND TO A HARD ALT OF 10000 FT. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT 10000 FT WAS THE ALT THEY (LAS APCH) WANTED US AT. WHEN LEVEL AT 10000 FT, LAS APCH ASKED US WHAT ALT WE WERE AT AND WHAT WE WERE ASSIGNED. WE RESPONDED WITH THE ABOVE, AND WERE GIVEN A PHONE NUMBER TO CALL WHEN WE LANDED. AT NO TIME WERE ANY ACFT IN OUR AREA. WE CALLED AND EXPLAINED TO APCH WHAT WE THOUGHT THE CLRNC MEANT, AND THEY SAID THERE WOULD BE NO ACTION AGAINST US, THAT THEY WANTED TO STRAIGHTEN THIS OUT TO AVOID FUTURE DEVS. I THINK ATC COULD HAVE BEEN CLRER AND MORE CONCISE BY STATING DSND TO LYNSY AT 12000 FT, AND THEN DSND AND MAINTAIN 10000 FT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.