Narrative:

While flying the tulsas 1A department from mex, we found that the gfms route differed from raw data on one leg. The second segment of the procedure, intercepting the positive control area R194 into positive control area was depicted several miles east of the actual VOR radial. We flew the raw data which subsequently rejoined the gfms route after the positive control area radial. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter revealed, a subsequent trip into MMMX, with a different aircraft same type, produced the same results. Company's vague response to his report implied the gfms routing was correct while the chart depiction is wrong. Reporter is expecting more information to be forthcoming as company continues to investigate the matter.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN MD80 CREW, DEPARTING MEXICO CITY, (MMMX) OBSERVED THAT THE 'GFMS' RTE AS FLOWN DEVIATED FROM THE RTE AS DEPICTED ON THE PUBLISHED DEP CHART.

Narrative: WHILE FLYING THE TULSAS 1A DEPT FROM MEX, WE FOUND THAT THE GFMS RTE DIFFERED FROM RAW DATA ON ONE LEG. THE SEC SEGMENT OF THE PROC, INTERCEPTING THE PCA R194 INTO PCA WAS DEPICTED SEVERAL MILES E OF THE ACTUAL VOR RADIAL. WE FLEW THE RAW DATA WHICH SUBSEQUENTLY REJOINED THE GFMS RTE AFTER THE PCA RADIAL. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR REVEALED, A SUBSEQUENT TRIP INTO MMMX, WITH A DIFFERENT ACFT SAME TYPE, PRODUCED THE SAME RESULTS. COMPANY'S VAGUE RESPONSE TO HIS RPT IMPLIED THE GFMS ROUTING WAS CORRECT WHILE THE CHART DEPICTION IS WRONG. RPTR IS EXPECTING MORE INFO TO BE FORTHCOMING AS COMPANY CONTINUES TO INVESTIGATE THE MATTER.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.