37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 565899 |
Time | |
Date | 200211 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bos.airport |
State Reference | MA |
Altitude | msl single value : 14000 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zbw.artcc tower : stl.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B767 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zbw.artcc |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65, Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Flight Phase | cruise : enroute altitude change descent : approach |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
ASRS Report | 565899 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
ASRS Report | 565898 |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment : tcas other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : overrode automation flight crew : took evasive action flight crew : took precautionary avoidance action other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew other |
Miss Distance | vertical : 800 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | FAA Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
After departing bos, we were on ZBW frequency at 14000 ft. Traffic was called at 15000 ft at 10 O'clock position. The traffic at 15000 ft reported us in sight and was cleared to remain in visual contact. We then acquired and reported the traffic in sight and subsequently cleared to FL230 and to remain visual. I initiated the climb on autoplt vertical speed at about 1500 FPM. The first officer and I watched the traffic and both commented on how close it looked. After a few seconds, I disconnected the autoplt in anticipation of lowering the nose. About then, the TCASII issued an RA and I lowered the nose more. The other aircraft went over us left to right and a clear of conflict was heard. Soon, the controller asked if we had difficulty keeping the traffic in visual contact. The first officer reported no. We saw the traffic coming and I started to react before the TCASII, but it still was too close for comfort. In over 30 yrs of flying large aircraft, this is a first. I don't think it is safe to allow visual separation for jet aircraft. It is too hard to judge the separation and closure rates. I will not accept one again and there is an assumption on both airplanes that you think you know what the other will do, but you don't. Both the copilot and I agree we will just take the radar separation next time with no assumptions. Supplemental information from acn 565898: he cleared us to climb to FL230. I told center we had traffic and were climbing to FL230. Center told us to maintain visual separation as well. The captain started the climb in vertical speed. At this time, the rj was about 5 mi and heading northwest. We were heading west. As we started to climb, I looked at the rj and it appeared to be turning toward us. I was getting ready to say something to the captain when we got a TCASII TA. The captain disengaged the autoplt and I looked at the rj again and he was still turning into us. The captain was lowering the nose as the rj flew behind us. I guessed the distance to be around 800 ft. As the rj was passing behind, we got a momentary 'descend' RA. A few moments later, center called and asked if we had any trouble maintaining a visual with the rj and I said no. I feel it was hard to judge closure in our climb and next time I would not call visual on the traffic. I think the rj was turning to pass behind us, but did not realize he was closing the distance between us. The situation developed quickly, so next time I will stay at a lower altitude till the conflicting traffic has passed.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B767 CREW TAKES EVASIVE ACTION FROM AN RJ IN ZBW CLASS E AIRSPACE AFTER ASSUMING VISUAL SEPARATION CLB DSCNT FROM EACH OTHER.
Narrative: AFTER DEPARTING BOS, WE WERE ON ZBW FREQ AT 14000 FT. TFC WAS CALLED AT 15000 FT AT 10 O'CLOCK POS. THE TFC AT 15000 FT RPTED US IN SIGHT AND WAS CLRED TO REMAIN IN VISUAL CONTACT. WE THEN ACQUIRED AND RPTED THE TFC IN SIGHT AND SUBSEQUENTLY CLRED TO FL230 AND TO REMAIN VISUAL. I INITIATED THE CLB ON AUTOPLT VERT SPD AT ABOUT 1500 FPM. THE FO AND I WATCHED THE TFC AND BOTH COMMENTED ON HOW CLOSE IT LOOKED. AFTER A FEW SECONDS, I DISCONNECTED THE AUTOPLT IN ANTICIPATION OF LOWERING THE NOSE. ABOUT THEN, THE TCASII ISSUED AN RA AND I LOWERED THE NOSE MORE. THE OTHER ACFT WENT OVER US L TO R AND A CLR OF CONFLICT WAS HEARD. SOON, THE CTLR ASKED IF WE HAD DIFFICULTY KEEPING THE TFC IN VISUAL CONTACT. THE FO RPTED NO. WE SAW THE TFC COMING AND I STARTED TO REACT BEFORE THE TCASII, BUT IT STILL WAS TOO CLOSE FOR COMFORT. IN OVER 30 YRS OF FLYING LARGE ACFT, THIS IS A FIRST. I DON'T THINK IT IS SAFE TO ALLOW VISUAL SEPARATION FOR JET ACFT. IT IS TOO HARD TO JUDGE THE SEPARATION AND CLOSURE RATES. I WILL NOT ACCEPT ONE AGAIN AND THERE IS AN ASSUMPTION ON BOTH AIRPLANES THAT YOU THINK YOU KNOW WHAT THE OTHER WILL DO, BUT YOU DON'T. BOTH THE COPLT AND I AGREE WE WILL JUST TAKE THE RADAR SEPARATION NEXT TIME WITH NO ASSUMPTIONS. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 565898: HE CLRED US TO CLB TO FL230. I TOLD CTR WE HAD TFC AND WERE CLBING TO FL230. CTR TOLD US TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION AS WELL. THE CAPT STARTED THE CLB IN VERT SPD. AT THIS TIME, THE RJ WAS ABOUT 5 MI AND HDG NW. WE WERE HDG W. AS WE STARTED TO CLB, I LOOKED AT THE RJ AND IT APPEARED TO BE TURNING TOWARD US. I WAS GETTING READY TO SAY SOMETHING TO THE CAPT WHEN WE GOT A TCASII TA. THE CAPT DISENGAGED THE AUTOPLT AND I LOOKED AT THE RJ AGAIN AND HE WAS STILL TURNING INTO US. THE CAPT WAS LOWERING THE NOSE AS THE RJ FLEW BEHIND US. I GUESSED THE DISTANCE TO BE AROUND 800 FT. AS THE RJ WAS PASSING BEHIND, WE GOT A MOMENTARY 'DSND' RA. A FEW MOMENTS LATER, CTR CALLED AND ASKED IF WE HAD ANY TROUBLE MAINTAINING A VISUAL WITH THE RJ AND I SAID NO. I FEEL IT WAS HARD TO JUDGE CLOSURE IN OUR CLB AND NEXT TIME I WOULD NOT CALL VISUAL ON THE TFC. I THINK THE RJ WAS TURNING TO PASS BEHIND US, BUT DID NOT REALIZE HE WAS CLOSING THE DISTANCE BTWN US. THE SIT DEVELOPED QUICKLY, SO NEXT TIME I WILL STAY AT A LOWER ALT TILL THE CONFLICTING TFC HAS PASSED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.