Narrative:

Began takeoff roll at approximately XA55. At approximately 100 KIAS, cockpit door opened. The door was closed by the first flight attendant approximately 2 mins later after airborne. There were no security incidents or known adverse passenger reactions to incident. Possible contributing factors: 1) crew became distraction just prior to pushback due to a passenger deplaning issue and possible impact on an on-time departure. 2) prior to descent, crew had flown 5 successive legs over 2 days on aircraft with the new fortress door and no security bar. 3) crew duty day had begun in mfr with incident at den occurring approximately 9 hours later. Fatigue may have been an issue. Bottom line: the fact that we had an unmodified door with a security bar flew under our radar screen den. CRM factors may have been distraction, crew fatigue and the fact that previous legs on this identify were flown exclusively with the new door and no security bar. Both captain and first officer agreed that with 2 different door system now on the company B737 fleet, that we both needed to develop a habit pattern during predep that included a visual check of the cockpit door prior to pushback.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-300 CREW, ON TKOF, EXPERIENCED THE COCKPIT DOOR COMING OPEN.

Narrative: BEGAN TKOF ROLL AT APPROX XA55. AT APPROX 100 KIAS, COCKPIT DOOR OPENED. THE DOOR WAS CLOSED BY THE FIRST FLT ATTENDANT APPROX 2 MINS LATER AFTER AIRBORNE. THERE WERE NO SECURITY INCIDENTS OR KNOWN ADVERSE PAX REACTIONS TO INCIDENT. POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: 1) CREW BECAME DISTR JUST PRIOR TO PUSHBACK DUE TO A PAX DEPLANING ISSUE AND POSSIBLE IMPACT ON AN ON-TIME DEP. 2) PRIOR TO DSCNT, CREW HAD FLOWN 5 SUCCESSIVE LEGS OVER 2 DAYS ON ACFT WITH THE NEW FORTRESS DOOR AND NO SECURITY BAR. 3) CREW DUTY DAY HAD BEGUN IN MFR WITH INCIDENT AT DEN OCCURRING APPROX 9 HRS LATER. FATIGUE MAY HAVE BEEN AN ISSUE. BOTTOM LINE: THE FACT THAT WE HAD AN UNMODIFIED DOOR WITH A SECURITY BAR FLEW UNDER OUR RADAR SCREEN DEN. CRM FACTORS MAY HAVE BEEN DISTR, CREW FATIGUE AND THE FACT THAT PREVIOUS LEGS ON THIS IDENT WERE FLOWN EXCLUSIVELY WITH THE NEW DOOR AND NO SECURITY BAR. BOTH CAPT AND FO AGREED THAT WITH 2 DIFFERENT DOOR SYS NOW ON THE COMPANY B737 FLEET, THAT WE BOTH NEEDED TO DEVELOP A HABIT PATTERN DURING PREDEP THAT INCLUDED A VISUAL CHK OF THE COCKPIT DOOR PRIOR TO PUSHBACK.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.