A dhc-8-400 crew slid 200 ft into the overrun of runway 3 after landing from an ILS.

Attributes
ACN	567288
Time
Date	200212
Day	Sun
Local Time Of Day	0601 To 1200
Place
Locale Reference	airport : geg.airport
State Reference	WA
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	IMC
Weather Elements	Fog Ice
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	Dash 8-400
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	landing : roll
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 210 flight time total : 2500 flight time type : 500
ASRS Report	567288
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Events
Anomaly	excursion : runway inflight encounter : weather non adherence : company policies non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly
Independent Detector	other flight crewa
Resolutory Action	none taken : unable
Consequence	other
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance Airport
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance

Narrative:

Expected a captain-monitored ILS runway 3 to geg. Normal approach with the captain landing the airplane. Normal deceleration until the captain braked to turn off the runway. Braking had no effect and the antiskid system started working. We slid past the threshold and about 200 ft into the overrun. Minimal aircraft damage and the passenger deplaned normally. I think that 2 things caused this incident. First, the latest metar we had showed that braking action was good. Tower didn't state otherwise. In fact, it wasn't good. I would estimate that it was probably fair with some areas of poor. Second, I feel that our brakes should've been more effective. Even though braking action was less than good, there was just a little frost on the runway and we should've been able to stop in the distance we had remaining. To prevent this from happening again, the aircraft should be fitted with better brakes and the tower should solicit and give out braking action reports.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A DHC-8-400 CREW SLID 200 FT INTO THE OVERRUN OF RWY 3 AFTER LNDG FROM AN ILS.

Narrative: EXPECTED A CAPT-MONITORED ILS RWY 3 TO GEG. NORMAL APCH WITH THE CAPT LNDG THE AIRPLANE. NORMAL DECELERATION UNTIL THE CAPT BRAKED TO TURN OFF THE RWY. BRAKING HAD NO EFFECT AND THE ANTISKID SYS STARTED WORKING. WE SLID PAST THE THRESHOLD AND ABOUT 200 FT INTO THE OVERRUN. MINIMAL ACFT DAMAGE AND THE PAX DEPLANED NORMALLY. I THINK THAT 2 THINGS CAUSED THIS INCIDENT. FIRST, THE LATEST METAR WE HAD SHOWED THAT BRAKING ACTION WAS GOOD. TWR DIDN'T STATE OTHERWISE. IN FACT, IT WASN'T GOOD. I WOULD ESTIMATE THAT IT WAS PROBABLY FAIR WITH SOME AREAS OF POOR. SECOND, I FEEL THAT OUR BRAKES SHOULD'VE BEEN MORE EFFECTIVE. EVEN THOUGH BRAKING ACTION WAS LESS THAN GOOD, THERE WAS JUST A LITTLE FROST ON THE RWY AND WE SHOULD'VE BEEN ABLE TO STOP IN THE DISTANCE WE HAD REMAINING. TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING AGAIN, THE ACFT SHOULD BE FITTED WITH BETTER BRAKES AND THE TWR SHOULD SOLICIT AND GIVE OUT BRAKING ACTION RPTS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.