Narrative:

During let-down in IMC to bfi, and after listening to ATIS and determining approach in use, I could not locate the approach plate. I informed the controller of the situation and he asked my intentions. I told him I would either need an approach to runway 13R (which I had) or vectors to a visual approach. The controller later asked if I could accept vectors to the runway 31L approach with him monitoring my progress. I replied that if he could give me the frequency and 'da,' I could accept it. I got the frequency and idented the localizer. The GS flag was not visible, but it became clear during the approach the GS was inoperative. I informed the controller of this fact and told the controller I would need the localizer only minimums. He issued them and told me my position relative to an approach fix, however without the plate I still didn't really know where I was with respect to my descent. After reaching a 4 mi fix (VFR GPS) on the localizer, I established a 500 FPM descent and established approach speed. Just as I was about to declare a missed approach to get better situational awareness or perhaps go elsewhere, I broke out and got the airport in sight (approximately 1000 ft AGL). I executed an uneventful landing. Key factors: 1) approach plate missing. I should have gone elsewhere. 2) GS failed without loss of identify or flag. 3) student in left seat: I took controls to intercept the localizer, but didn't fly it well due to high workload, trying to come up with a plan, and trying to fly it from the right seat. 4) missing approach plate would have been much less problematic if the GS hadn't failed.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: C172 PLT EXECUTES INST APCH WITHOUT THE ASSOCIATED APCH PLATE.

Narrative: DURING LET-DOWN IN IMC TO BFI, AND AFTER LISTENING TO ATIS AND DETERMINING APCH IN USE, I COULD NOT LOCATE THE APCH PLATE. I INFORMED THE CTLR OF THE SIT AND HE ASKED MY INTENTIONS. I TOLD HIM I WOULD EITHER NEED AN APCH TO RWY 13R (WHICH I HAD) OR VECTORS TO A VISUAL APCH. THE CTLR LATER ASKED IF I COULD ACCEPT VECTORS TO THE RWY 31L APCH WITH HIM MONITORING MY PROGRESS. I REPLIED THAT IF HE COULD GIVE ME THE FREQ AND 'DA,' I COULD ACCEPT IT. I GOT THE FREQ AND IDENTED THE LOC. THE GS FLAG WAS NOT VISIBLE, BUT IT BECAME CLR DURING THE APCH THE GS WAS INOP. I INFORMED THE CTLR OF THIS FACT AND TOLD THE CTLR I WOULD NEED THE LOC ONLY MINIMUMS. HE ISSUED THEM AND TOLD ME MY POS RELATIVE TO AN APCH FIX, HOWEVER WITHOUT THE PLATE I STILL DIDN'T REALLY KNOW WHERE I WAS WITH RESPECT TO MY DSCNT. AFTER REACHING A 4 MI FIX (VFR GPS) ON THE LOC, I ESTABLISHED A 500 FPM DSCNT AND ESTABLISHED APCH SPD. JUST AS I WAS ABOUT TO DECLARE A MISSED APCH TO GET BETTER SITUATIONAL AWARENESS OR PERHAPS GO ELSEWHERE, I BROKE OUT AND GOT THE ARPT IN SIGHT (APPROX 1000 FT AGL). I EXECUTED AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG. KEY FACTORS: 1) APCH PLATE MISSING. I SHOULD HAVE GONE ELSEWHERE. 2) GS FAILED WITHOUT LOSS OF IDENT OR FLAG. 3) STUDENT IN L SEAT: I TOOK CTLS TO INTERCEPT THE LOC, BUT DIDN'T FLY IT WELL DUE TO HIGH WORKLOAD, TRYING TO COME UP WITH A PLAN, AND TRYING TO FLY IT FROM THE R SEAT. 4) MISSING APCH PLATE WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH LESS PROBLEMATIC IF THE GS HADN'T FAILED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.