37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 582297 |
Time | |
Date | 200305 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lax.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl single value : 400 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : lax.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : go around |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : lax.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B727 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial climbout : takeoff |
Route In Use | departure : noise abatement |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 210 flight time total : 20000 flight time type : 3000 |
ASRS Report | 582297 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 3000 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance Airport |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
Lax conducting lndgs to the east, departures to the west for noise abatement. We were cleared to land on runway 7L. Tower cleared the B727 to take off on runway 25L and when they were airborne, realized there was a conflict. At that time, tower ordered us to turn left immediately. We turned left and executed go around. We were later informed there was no loss of separation. If we had continued to a landing, there would have been no collision, but there would have been loss of separation. My concerns during the evasive maneuver were obstacle clearance and traffic conflicts on runways 6L and 6R. To prevent future problems, lax should keep arrs on runway 6L/6R and departures on runway 25L/25R in the early morning hours.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B767 LNDG LAX HAS NMAC WITH DEPARTING B727.
Narrative: LAX CONDUCTING LNDGS TO THE E, DEPS TO THE W FOR NOISE ABATEMENT. WE WERE CLRED TO LAND ON RWY 7L. TWR CLRED THE B727 TO TAKE OFF ON RWY 25L AND WHEN THEY WERE AIRBORNE, REALIZED THERE WAS A CONFLICT. AT THAT TIME, TWR ORDERED US TO TURN L IMMEDIATELY. WE TURNED L AND EXECUTED GAR. WE WERE LATER INFORMED THERE WAS NO LOSS OF SEPARATION. IF WE HAD CONTINUED TO A LNDG, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO COLLISION, BUT THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN LOSS OF SEPARATION. MY CONCERNS DURING THE EVASIVE MANEUVER WERE OBSTACLE CLRNC AND TFC CONFLICTS ON RWYS 6L AND 6R. TO PREVENT FUTURE PROBS, LAX SHOULD KEEP ARRS ON RWY 6L/6R AND DEPS ON RWY 25L/25R IN THE EARLY MORNING HRS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.