Narrative:

We had been vectored off the madn 4 arrival into oak and were returning to that arrival. Heading 300 degrees direct to catty approximately 10 mi from catty, ATC gave us traffic at 12 O'clock position, opposite direction 7000 ft. At the same time TCASII gave us a 'traffic' call. TCASII showed a yellow contact at 7300 ft 12 O'clock position approximately 5 mi climbing. We had the traffic visually. The TCASII contact turned red, 'monitor vertical speed' was heard. ATC told the aircraft 'I need you at 7000 ft.' the aircraft passed under us at -400 ft. No evasive action taken. Why was an aircraft going the opposite direction of an active arrival into a major airport?

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B757 CREW INBOUND TO OAK AT 8000 FT ENCOUNTER OPPOSITE DIRECTION TFC THAT APPARENTLY DRIFTED OFF ITS ASSIGNED 7000 FT ALT TO 7600 FT.

Narrative: WE HAD BEEN VECTORED OFF THE MADN 4 ARR INTO OAK AND WERE RETURNING TO THAT ARR. HEADING 300 DEGS DIRECT TO CATTY APPROX 10 MI FROM CATTY, ATC GAVE US TFC AT 12 O'CLOCK POS, OPPOSITE DIRECTION 7000 FT. AT THE SAME TIME TCASII GAVE US A 'TFC' CALL. TCASII SHOWED A YELLOW CONTACT AT 7300 FT 12 O'CLOCK POS APPROX 5 MI CLBING. WE HAD THE TFC VISUALLY. THE TCASII CONTACT TURNED RED, 'MONITOR VERT SPD' WAS HEARD. ATC TOLD THE ACFT 'I NEED YOU AT 7000 FT.' THE ACFT PASSED UNDER US AT -400 FT. NO EVASIVE ACTION TAKEN. WHY WAS AN ACFT GOING THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF AN ACTIVE ARR INTO A MAJOR ARPT?

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.