37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 589009 |
Time | |
Date | 200307 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : ocn.vortac |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl single value : 3500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Weather Elements | Rain other |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : sct.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skylane 182/RG Turbo Skylane/RG |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Route In Use | enroute other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 23 flight time total : 245 flight time type : 150 |
ASRS Report | 589009 |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : vfr in imc non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : exited adverse environment flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course flight crew : became reoriented flight crew : took precautionary avoidance action |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Weather Airspace Structure Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
We received a WX briefing reporting 4 mi visibility in mist along our route with possible isolated thunderstorms. We decided to go VFR. Our flight had us following the coastline about 1/2 mi out to sea. I was mostly keeping track of the coastline at our 10 O'clock position. I could tell it was at least 4-5 mi visibility. I assumed this was the case all around. The combination of the mist and grey ocean made it hard to tell we were approaching a rain shower straight ahead. I went from a clear view of the coastline, below to the left, to zero visibility instantly. To make matters worse, we were passing a restr area 1/2 mi to our left, so I decided to turn a right 180 degrees. This was the wrong thing to do because I went toward the cloud and away from land. This disoriented me for a moment, but I was able to get us turned around and into clear air. The first thing I learned is that being over a large body of water makes it hard to judge visibility. If there is any questions, I will keep over land for better visual cues. The other thing I should have done was turned left. I would have had the land as a reference right away and I would have been going away from the cloud. I was a little worried about the restr area, but I probably could have stayed out of it and even if I didn't, it would have been better than what could have happened.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT OF VFR C182 BLUNDERS INTO IMC CONDITIONS OFF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTLINE IN CONDITIONS RPTED AS 4 MI VISIBILITY IN MIST WITH POSSIBLE TSTMS. DOES 180 DEGS TO EXIT CONDITION.
Narrative: WE RECEIVED A WX BRIEFING RPTING 4 MI VISIBILITY IN MIST ALONG OUR RTE WITH POSSIBLE ISOLATED TSTMS. WE DECIDED TO GO VFR. OUR FLT HAD US FOLLOWING THE COASTLINE ABOUT 1/2 MI OUT TO SEA. I WAS MOSTLY KEEPING TRACK OF THE COASTLINE AT OUR 10 O'CLOCK POS. I COULD TELL IT WAS AT LEAST 4-5 MI VISIBILITY. I ASSUMED THIS WAS THE CASE ALL AROUND. THE COMBINATION OF THE MIST AND GREY OCEAN MADE IT HARD TO TELL WE WERE APCHING A RAIN SHOWER STRAIGHT AHEAD. I WENT FROM A CLR VIEW OF THE COASTLINE, BELOW TO THE L, TO ZERO VISIBILITY INSTANTLY. TO MAKE MATTERS WORSE, WE WERE PASSING A RESTR AREA 1/2 MI TO OUR L, SO I DECIDED TO TURN A R 180 DEGS. THIS WAS THE WRONG THING TO DO BECAUSE I WENT TOWARD THE CLOUD AND AWAY FROM LAND. THIS DISORIENTED ME FOR A MOMENT, BUT I WAS ABLE TO GET US TURNED AROUND AND INTO CLR AIR. THE FIRST THING I LEARNED IS THAT BEING OVER A LARGE BODY OF WATER MAKES IT HARD TO JUDGE VISIBILITY. IF THERE IS ANY QUESTIONS, I WILL KEEP OVER LAND FOR BETTER VISUAL CUES. THE OTHER THING I SHOULD HAVE DONE WAS TURNED L. I WOULD HAVE HAD THE LAND AS A REF RIGHT AWAY AND I WOULD HAVE BEEN GOING AWAY FROM THE CLOUD. I WAS A LITTLE WORRIED ABOUT THE RESTR AREA, BUT I PROBABLY COULD HAVE STAYED OUT OF IT AND EVEN IF I DIDN'T, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER THAN WHAT COULD HAVE HAPPENED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.