37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 603724 |
Time | |
Date | 200312 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lvk.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : zzz.tower |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, Low Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 25 flight time total : 1100 flight time type : 55 |
ASRS Report | 603724 |
Person 2 | |
Function | observation : passenger |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other other : 4 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | other other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airport Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
While taxiing for a pleasure flight, I crossed a storm drain which was installed across the taxiway. The nosewheel dipped into the drain and there was a propeller strike which was not known by me or my passenger (an ATP). Runup and flight exhibited no unusual operation, but the tower notified me that someone reported a possible propeller strike. Upon shutdown, I found that, indeed, there had been a propeller strike. The drain was a portion of the active taxiway (meaning I did not venture off taxiway) and was perpendicular (crossed) the taxiway. In my opinion, the drain needs to be designed with a shallower depth and wider drain. Taxi speed was at a 'brisk walk' speed. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter indicated they were actually in a parking area north of taxiway I and north and just east of taxiway D. Neither pilot claimed they knew they had a propeller strike.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SMA PLT FLEW THE ACFT AFTER BEING ADVISED THAT THEY HAD A PROP STRIKE XING A STORM DRAIN IN THE TXWY AT LVK.
Narrative: WHILE TAXIING FOR A PLEASURE FLT, I CROSSED A STORM DRAIN WHICH WAS INSTALLED ACROSS THE TXWY. THE NOSEWHEEL DIPPED INTO THE DRAIN AND THERE WAS A PROP STRIKE WHICH WAS NOT KNOWN BY ME OR MY PAX (AN ATP). RUNUP AND FLT EXHIBITED NO UNUSUAL OP, BUT THE TWR NOTIFIED ME THAT SOMEONE RPTED A POSSIBLE PROP STRIKE. UPON SHUTDOWN, I FOUND THAT, INDEED, THERE HAD BEEN A PROP STRIKE. THE DRAIN WAS A PORTION OF THE ACTIVE TXWY (MEANING I DID NOT VENTURE OFF TXWY) AND WAS PERPENDICULAR (CROSSED) THE TXWY. IN MY OPINION, THE DRAIN NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED WITH A SHALLOWER DEPTH AND WIDER DRAIN. TAXI SPD WAS AT A 'BRISK WALK' SPD. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR INDICATED THEY WERE ACTUALLY IN A PARKING AREA N OF TXWY I AND N AND JUST E OF TXWY D. NEITHER PLT CLAIMED THEY KNEW THEY HAD A PROP STRIKE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.