37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 617992 |
Time | |
Date | 200405 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lga.airport |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 30 |
Environment | |
Weather Elements | Rain |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : lga.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : roll landing other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 617992 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : clearance other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : landed as precaution none taken : insufficient time |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance Navigational Facility Weather |
Primary Problem | Navigational Facility |
Narrative:
Right about flare we heard a 'go around' command issued by tower but, did not hear the flight number. We assumed it was the aircraft behind us because we were just about to touch down. After touchdown, the tower advised us that they were sorry for the confusion. It was a glitch on their end. I called the tower to get details and discovered that the 'amass' system (not familiar with the acronym) had issued a conflict. However, the manager on duty said that this was an anomaly in the system because a rain shower that was passing the airport had set it off in error. Apparently, the controller is mandated to issue the go around command in this case. I discussed with the controller that neither the first officer nor I heard the flight number associated with the command and that we were 'locked' into the landing at that point. I suggested that if the command is issued again in the future that it should be very authoritative and clearly audible so that the crew can react without confusion.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B757 LNDG LGA IS ISSUED GAR DURING FLARE, FLT CREW FAILS TO HEAR AND REACT TO GAR INSTRUCTIONS.
Narrative: RIGHT ABOUT FLARE WE HEARD A 'GAR' COMMAND ISSUED BY TWR BUT, DID NOT HEAR THE FLT NUMBER. WE ASSUMED IT WAS THE ACFT BEHIND US BECAUSE WE WERE JUST ABOUT TO TOUCH DOWN. AFTER TOUCHDOWN, THE TWR ADVISED US THAT THEY WERE SORRY FOR THE CONFUSION. IT WAS A GLITCH ON THEIR END. I CALLED THE TWR TO GET DETAILS AND DISCOVERED THAT THE 'AMASS' SYS (NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE ACRONYM) HAD ISSUED A CONFLICT. HOWEVER, THE MGR ON DUTY SAID THAT THIS WAS AN ANOMALY IN THE SYS BECAUSE A RAIN SHOWER THAT WAS PASSING THE ARPT HAD SET IT OFF IN ERROR. APPARENTLY, THE CTLR IS MANDATED TO ISSUE THE GAR COMMAND IN THIS CASE. I DISCUSSED WITH THE CTLR THAT NEITHER THE FO NOR I HEARD THE FLT NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMMAND AND THAT WE WERE 'LOCKED' INTO THE LNDG AT THAT POINT. I SUGGESTED THAT IF THE COMMAND IS ISSUED AGAIN IN THE FUTURE THAT IT SHOULD BE VERY AUTHORITATIVE AND CLRLY AUDIBLE SO THAT THE CREW CAN REACT WITHOUT CONFUSION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.