37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 621654 |
Time | |
Date | 200406 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : mie.vor |
State Reference | IN |
Altitude | msl single value : 31000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Weather Elements | Thunderstorm Turbulence |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zid.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Route In Use | enroute : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 4900 flight time type : 1500 |
ASRS Report | 621654 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical cabin event other inflight encounter : turbulence inflight encounter : weather other anomaly |
Independent Detector | other other : 5 |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : regained aircraft control none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Weather Aircraft Company |
Primary Problem | Weather |
Narrative:
We were flying in IMC at FL310. We noticed on the radar that there were storms (3 cells) at our 12 O'clock position, about 50 mi ahead. According to our company manual, we must stay at least 20 mi away from the storms. I decided to be conservative, and realized that we could make a small deviation at 50 mi away, instead of a large deviation closer. Therefore, at about 50 mi from the storms, we began to deviate. We were IMC, so we could not see ahead of us. We encountered some moderate turbulence that kicked the autoplt off. Once we corrected the situation, were out of the turbulence, and got the autoplt back on. We called to the cabin to make sure that everyone was alright. A flight attendant that was non-reving on our flight answered and said that our flight attendant had hit her shoulder and was lying in the galley. We were told she would not be able to continue her duties, and that the non-revenue flight attendant would secure the cabin for us. We then decided to divert to cmh to seek medical attention for our flight attendant. After a normal landing, she was taken to the hospital by ambulance. The only thing that I believe could have prevented this is a better onboard WX radar. The WX radar on board the erj has a very small dish and is, in general, very poor.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN EMB145 CAPT RPTED THAT A FLT ATTENDANT WAS INJURED DURING A TURB ENCOUNTER IN ZID'S AIRSPACE, AND THAT A NON-REVENUE FLT ATTENDANT VOLUNTEERED TO TAKE OVER CABIN DUTIES.
Narrative: WE WERE FLYING IN IMC AT FL310. WE NOTICED ON THE RADAR THAT THERE WERE STORMS (3 CELLS) AT OUR 12 O'CLOCK POS, ABOUT 50 MI AHEAD. ACCORDING TO OUR COMPANY MANUAL, WE MUST STAY AT LEAST 20 MI AWAY FROM THE STORMS. I DECIDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE, AND REALIZED THAT WE COULD MAKE A SMALL DEV AT 50 MI AWAY, INSTEAD OF A LARGE DEV CLOSER. THEREFORE, AT ABOUT 50 MI FROM THE STORMS, WE BEGAN TO DEVIATE. WE WERE IMC, SO WE COULD NOT SEE AHEAD OF US. WE ENCOUNTERED SOME MODERATE TURB THAT KICKED THE AUTOPLT OFF. ONCE WE CORRECTED THE SIT, WERE OUT OF THE TURB, AND GOT THE AUTOPLT BACK ON. WE CALLED TO THE CABIN TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE WAS ALRIGHT. A FLT ATTENDANT THAT WAS NON-REVING ON OUR FLT ANSWERED AND SAID THAT OUR FLT ATTENDANT HAD HIT HER SHOULDER AND WAS LYING IN THE GALLEY. WE WERE TOLD SHE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CONTINUE HER DUTIES, AND THAT THE NON-REVENUE FLT ATTENDANT WOULD SECURE THE CABIN FOR US. WE THEN DECIDED TO DIVERT TO CMH TO SEEK MEDICAL ATTN FOR OUR FLT ATTENDANT. AFTER A NORMAL LNDG, SHE WAS TAKEN TO THE HOSPITAL BY AMBULANCE. THE ONLY THING THAT I BELIEVE COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS IS A BETTER ONBOARD WX RADAR. THE WX RADAR ON BOARD THE ERJ HAS A VERY SMALL DISH AND IS, IN GENERAL, VERY POOR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.