37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 634142 |
Time | |
Date | 200410 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : mmto.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Qualification | technician : powerplant technician : airframe |
ASRS Report | 634142 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper maintenance maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other other : 1 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : manuals contributing factor : work cards contributing factor : engineering procedure performance deficiency : installation performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : scheduled maintenance performance deficiency : inspection |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Chart Or Publication Aircraft Maintenance Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
On oct/fri/04 at XA10, I was working on aircraft accessing areas in the main east&east bay for the ACARS modification. I removed the E3-5 moisture shroud (ipc reference 25-51-00-20) to access the E3-2 disconnect bracket. Many -300/-500 aircraft do not even have the shroud installed when the aircraft arrives. I filled out a yellow tag parts bag, placed hardware in bag and attached bag to shroud and placed shroud on east&east bay removed rack. In the ACARS paperwork for a -700 aircraft it says to access as necessary to install wires. The -300/-500 paperwork does not state this. The aircraft departed on oct/tue/04 without the E3-5 moisture shroud being reinstalled. My failure to generate a non routine technical write-up for parts removed in aircraft engineering modification is to blame for this event.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-300 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH THE MOISTURE SHROUD PROTECTING E3-5 ELECTRONIC RACK NOT INSTALLED.
Narrative: ON OCT/FRI/04 AT XA10, I WAS WORKING ON ACFT ACCESSING AREAS IN THE MAIN E&E BAY FOR THE ACARS MODIFICATION. I REMOVED THE E3-5 MOISTURE SHROUD (IPC REF 25-51-00-20) TO ACCESS THE E3-2 DISCONNECT BRACKET. MANY -300/-500 ACFT DO NOT EVEN HAVE THE SHROUD INSTALLED WHEN THE ACFT ARRIVES. I FILLED OUT A YELLOW TAG PARTS BAG, PLACED HARDWARE IN BAG AND ATTACHED BAG TO SHROUD AND PLACED SHROUD ON E&E BAY REMOVED RACK. IN THE ACARS PAPERWORK FOR A -700 ACFT IT SAYS TO ACCESS AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL WIRES. THE -300/-500 PAPERWORK DOES NOT STATE THIS. THE ACFT DEPARTED ON OCT/TUE/04 WITHOUT THE E3-5 MOISTURE SHROUD BEING REINSTALLED. MY FAILURE TO GENERATE A NON ROUTINE TECHNICAL WRITE-UP FOR PARTS REMOVED IN ACFT ENGINEERING MODIFICATION IS TO BLAME FOR THIS EVENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.