37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 654446 |
Time | |
Date | 200503 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : orl.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | PA-34-200 Seneca I |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | landing : roll ground : maintenance |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 20 flight time total : 400 flight time type : 10 |
ASRS Report | 654446 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical excursion : runway other anomaly other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
After touchdown; the tower requested that the aircraft expedite its taxi from the runway to allow for a jet departure prior to a single engine aircraft landing. Both the pilot and flight instructor attempted to effectively reduce speed so the aircraft could clear onto an approaching taxi area. Due to the speed of the aircraft it was agreed that the first exit was unattainable and that a continued taxi on the runway to the next exit was required. As the student began to taxi clear of the runway at the next intersection; almost all effective braking was lost. The turn required to remain on the taxiway was not possible without braking. The student continued steering with minimal results and directed the aircraft between taxiway edge lighting while the instructor shut off both engines by stopping fuel flow by way of the mixture controls so as to prevent a propeller strike to the taxiway lighting or the uneven surface of the grass area adjacent to the taxiway. The aircraft was then safely brought to a stop in the grass area next to the taxiway. The aircraft was later towed back to a hangar where it was determined that air bubbles in the brake line were the cause of the brake failure. It was also found that the right brake had the least amount of force of the 2 main brakes which would make a turn to the right very difficult; if not impossible. The aircraft in this case exited the taxiway while attempting a right turn. I believe the event was a result of equipment failure compounded by the environment at the time that it occurred. The focus and stress associated with a single engine instrument approach and the rushed or hurried attitude presented by the controller produced an environment that was abnormal.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A LNDG PA34 EXPERIENCED GREATLY REDUCED BRAKE EFFECTIVENESS CAUSING A RWY EXCURSION DURING A TWR REQUESTED EXPEDITED TAXI.
Narrative: AFTER TOUCHDOWN; THE TWR REQUESTED THAT THE ACFT EXPEDITE ITS TAXI FROM THE RWY TO ALLOW FOR A JET DEP PRIOR TO A SINGLE ENG ACFT LNDG. BOTH THE PLT AND FLT INSTRUCTOR ATTEMPTED TO EFFECTIVELY REDUCE SPD SO THE ACFT COULD CLR ONTO AN APCHING TAXI AREA. DUE TO THE SPD OF THE ACFT IT WAS AGREED THAT THE FIRST EXIT WAS UNATTAINABLE AND THAT A CONTINUED TAXI ON THE RWY TO THE NEXT EXIT WAS REQUIRED. AS THE STUDENT BEGAN TO TAXI CLR OF THE RWY AT THE NEXT INTXN; ALMOST ALL EFFECTIVE BRAKING WAS LOST. THE TURN REQUIRED TO REMAIN ON THE TXWY WAS NOT POSSIBLE WITHOUT BRAKING. THE STUDENT CONTINUED STEERING WITH MINIMAL RESULTS AND DIRECTED THE ACFT BTWN TXWY EDGE LIGHTING WHILE THE INSTRUCTOR SHUT OFF BOTH ENGS BY STOPPING FUEL FLOW BY WAY OF THE MIXTURE CTLS SO AS TO PREVENT A PROP STRIKE TO THE TXWY LIGHTING OR THE UNEVEN SURFACE OF THE GRASS AREA ADJACENT TO THE TXWY. THE ACFT WAS THEN SAFELY BROUGHT TO A STOP IN THE GRASS AREA NEXT TO THE TXWY. THE ACFT WAS LATER TOWED BACK TO A HANGAR WHERE IT WAS DETERMINED THAT AIR BUBBLES IN THE BRAKE LINE WERE THE CAUSE OF THE BRAKE FAILURE. IT WAS ALSO FOUND THAT THE R BRAKE HAD THE LEAST AMOUNT OF FORCE OF THE 2 MAIN BRAKES WHICH WOULD MAKE A TURN TO THE R VERY DIFFICULT; IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE. THE ACFT IN THIS CASE EXITED THE TXWY WHILE ATTEMPTING A R TURN. I BELIEVE THE EVENT WAS A RESULT OF EQUIP FAILURE COMPOUNDED BY THE ENVIRONMENT AT THE TIME THAT IT OCCURRED. THE FOCUS AND STRESS ASSOCIATED WITH A SINGLE ENG INST APCH AND THE RUSHED OR HURRIED ATTITUDE PRESENTED BY THE CTLR PRODUCED AN ENVIRONMENT THAT WAS ABNORMAL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.