Narrative:

On may/wed/05; I was the first officer on flight X; ZZZ1 to ZZZ2. On ship #X prior to boarding in ZZZ1; the flight attendants noticed the smoke curtain would not secure properly. Maintenance met the aircraft and said it was ok. The flight attendants and I told the mechanics that an FAA inspector; who was conducting ramp checks in ZZZ1 last yr; said the smoke curtain had to be fully secured in the event of smoke. The mechanics then said the smoke curtain was ok; 'because ATR said so;' and left the aircraft. The flight attendants then made a call to their supervisor and were told to write it up and go ahead and board the flight; since maintenance said it was ok. The flight then departed to ZZZ2. I am still unsure as to what is considered a properly secured smoke curtain.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN ATR72 WITH A CABIN ATTENDANT'S RPT OF THE SMOKE CURTAIN WOULD NOT SECURE PROPERLY. TECHNICIAN DISMISSED RPT WITH 'CURTAIN OK PER ATR.'

Narrative: ON MAY/WED/05; I WAS THE FO ON FLT X; ZZZ1 TO ZZZ2. ON SHIP #X PRIOR TO BOARDING IN ZZZ1; THE FLT ATTENDANTS NOTICED THE SMOKE CURTAIN WOULD NOT SECURE PROPERLY. MAINT MET THE ACFT AND SAID IT WAS OK. THE FLT ATTENDANTS AND I TOLD THE MECHS THAT AN FAA INSPECTOR; WHO WAS CONDUCTING RAMP CHKS IN ZZZ1 LAST YR; SAID THE SMOKE CURTAIN HAD TO BE FULLY SECURED IN THE EVENT OF SMOKE. THE MECHS THEN SAID THE SMOKE CURTAIN WAS OK; 'BECAUSE ATR SAID SO;' AND LEFT THE ACFT. THE FLT ATTENDANTS THEN MADE A CALL TO THEIR SUPVR AND WERE TOLD TO WRITE IT UP AND GO AHEAD AND BOARD THE FLT; SINCE MAINT SAID IT WAS OK. THE FLT THEN DEPARTED TO ZZZ2. I AM STILL UNSURE AS TO WHAT IS CONSIDERED A PROPERLY SECURED SMOKE CURTAIN.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.