37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 658311 |
Time | |
Date | 200505 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : chs.vortac |
State Reference | SC |
Altitude | msl single value : 3000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : chs.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller radar : 9 |
ASRS Report | 658311 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | oversight : supervisor |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe |
Independent Detector | atc equipment : conflict alert other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance controller : issued alert |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
While working heavy traffic and combined position; I was distraction by 2 departures off chs that were departed in rapid succession and I noticed aircraft #1 descending out of 4100 ft and knew it would conflict with aircraft #2. (Both had been descended to 3000 ft.) I vectored aircraft #2 away from aircraft #1 and I was using diverging courses in lieu of vertical separation. Pilot got #1 aircraft in sight and was instructed to maintain visual separation well after he had it in sight. I should have given the instructions to maintain visual separation immediately. I didn't; so I was questioned and felt I needed to report it to my supervisor who saw the whole thing from behind me. I spoke to the pilots who stated they had no problem with it and had received neither an RA nor TA.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CHS CTLR EXPERIENCED NEAR LOSS OF SEPARATION WHEN HE OR SHE WAS LATE IN UTILIZING VISUAL SEPARATION PROCS.
Narrative: WHILE WORKING HVY TFC AND COMBINED POS; I WAS DISTR BY 2 DEPS OFF CHS THAT WERE DEPARTED IN RAPID SUCCESSION AND I NOTICED ACFT #1 DSNDING OUT OF 4100 FT AND KNEW IT WOULD CONFLICT WITH ACFT #2. (BOTH HAD BEEN DSNDED TO 3000 FT.) I VECTORED ACFT #2 AWAY FROM ACFT #1 AND I WAS USING DIVERGING COURSES IN LIEU OF VERT SEPARATION. PLT GOT #1 ACFT IN SIGHT AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION WELL AFTER HE HAD IT IN SIGHT. I SHOULD HAVE GIVEN THE INSTRUCTIONS TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION IMMEDIATELY. I DIDN'T; SO I WAS QUESTIONED AND FELT I NEEDED TO RPT IT TO MY SUPVR WHO SAW THE WHOLE THING FROM BEHIND ME. I SPOKE TO THE PLTS WHO STATED THEY HAD NO PROB WITH IT AND HAD RECEIVED NEITHER AN RA NOR TA.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.