37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 662725 |
Time | |
Date | 200505 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : parked ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight attendant : on duty |
ASRS Report | 662725 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper maintenance non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure non adherence : company policies |
Independent Detector | other other : 1 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : inspection |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Environmental Factor Aircraft Cabin Crew Human Performance Maintenance Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance Chart Or Publication |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
The door pressure gauges at doors 1R and 2R were below minimums. 1R was at 750 psi and door 2R was at 1100 psi. They should have been at 1750 psi or so. The door pressure gauges are not a flight attendant preflight check. I check because this is happening often. I called for a mechanic and asked if they check them and they said no. Who does and when? This is very alarming to me. If there was an emergency; we would have had to redirect on the right side forward and aft. Could have been crucial time wasted. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated that in most cases when reporting a low door bottle pressure that needs servicing; she receives criticism for delaying the flight mainly from the flight crew. She was told that a cabin attendant is not to check door bottle pressure as it is not part of the preflight check. Reporter feels that this is a safety of flight item and needs to be 100% operational. Bottle pressures are checked at 45 hour intervals and after cold soaking in a long flight; the bottle pressure normally drops; but must remain within limits.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN A320 CABIN ATTENDANT RPTS FINDING DOOR BOTTLE PRESSURE INDICATIONS BELOW LIMITS.
Narrative: THE DOOR PRESSURE GAUGES AT DOORS 1R AND 2R WERE BELOW MINIMUMS. 1R WAS AT 750 PSI AND DOOR 2R WAS AT 1100 PSI. THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN AT 1750 PSI OR SO. THE DOOR PRESSURE GAUGES ARE NOT A FLT ATTENDANT PREFLT CHK. I CHK BECAUSE THIS IS HAPPENING OFTEN. I CALLED FOR A MECHANIC AND ASKED IF THEY CHK THEM AND THEY SAID NO. WHO DOES AND WHEN? THIS IS VERY ALARMING TO ME. IF THERE WAS AN EMER; WE WOULD HAVE HAD TO REDIRECT ON THE R SIDE FORWARD AND AFT. COULD HAVE BEEN CRUCIAL TIME WASTED. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATED THAT IN MOST CASES WHEN RPTING A LOW DOOR BOTTLE PRESSURE THAT NEEDS SERVICING; SHE RECEIVES CRITICISM FOR DELAYING THE FLT MAINLY FROM THE FLT CREW. SHE WAS TOLD THAT A CABIN ATTENDANT IS NOT TO CHK DOOR BOTTLE PRESSURE AS IT IS NOT PART OF THE PREFLT CHK. RPTR FEELS THAT THIS IS A SAFETY OF FLT ITEM AND NEEDS TO BE 100% OPERATIONAL. BOTTLE PRESSURES ARE CHKED AT 45 HOUR INTERVALS AND AFTER COLD SOAKING IN A LONG FLT; THE BOTTLE PRESSURE NORMALLY DROPS; BUT MUST REMAIN WITHIN LIMITS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.