37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 674736 |
Time | |
Date | 200510 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : lax.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Embraer Jet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight ground : parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
ASRS Report | 674736 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : non compliance with mel non adherence : company policies non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : a/i value indications other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : testing performance deficiency : inspection performance deficiency : fault isolation |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Chart Or Publication Maintenance Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
During climb out on our way to ZZZ; the captain performed the first flight of the day ice protection test (pneumatic). Engine #2 failed the test. We contacted maintenance control. They and the captain determined it was ok to continue to ZZZ. When we arrived in ZZZ; contract maintenance was there. I did a postflt inspection of the aircraft. By this time the maintenance guy was on top of the #2 engine pylon. I completed all duties I could for the next flight and went to the terminal. When I came back; the maintenance guy was in my seat doing an engine run. After this; he signed off the logbook and we began to prepare for the flight back. During the flight back; the captain and I began to discuss what we saw on the anti-ice; and it just didn't seem right. We felt we should see an 'open' description on the anti-ice panel for engine #2. We made the decision to not enter any ice conditions in case this was not done correctly. During the descent; we got a message of 'high stage valve failed.' this message came and went a couple of times. We saw it on the panel on the descent and then a couple of times on final approach to dfw. When we arrived in dfw; we contacted maintenance and told them what we saw. They later said it looked like the maintenance guy in ZZZ wired the wrong valve; which confirmed to us that we had no anti-icing capabilities.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN EMB140 WITH ENG ANTI-ICE VALVE MALFUNCTION WAS WORKED OFF LINE BY CONTRACT TECHNICIAN. WIRED THE HIGH STAGE VALVE CLOSED INSTEAD OF COWL VALVE.
Narrative: DURING CLBOUT ON OUR WAY TO ZZZ; THE CAPT PERFORMED THE FIRST FLT OF THE DAY ICE PROTECTION TEST (PNEUMATIC). ENG #2 FAILED THE TEST. WE CONTACTED MAINT CTL. THEY AND THE CAPT DETERMINED IT WAS OK TO CONTINUE TO ZZZ. WHEN WE ARRIVED IN ZZZ; CONTRACT MAINT WAS THERE. I DID A POSTFLT INSPECTION OF THE ACFT. BY THIS TIME THE MAINT GUY WAS ON TOP OF THE #2 ENG PYLON. I COMPLETED ALL DUTIES I COULD FOR THE NEXT FLT AND WENT TO THE TERMINAL. WHEN I CAME BACK; THE MAINT GUY WAS IN MY SEAT DOING AN ENG RUN. AFTER THIS; HE SIGNED OFF THE LOGBOOK AND WE BEGAN TO PREPARE FOR THE FLT BACK. DURING THE FLT BACK; THE CAPT AND I BEGAN TO DISCUSS WHAT WE SAW ON THE ANTI-ICE; AND IT JUST DIDN'T SEEM RIGHT. WE FELT WE SHOULD SEE AN 'OPEN' DESCRIPTION ON THE ANTI-ICE PANEL FOR ENG #2. WE MADE THE DECISION TO NOT ENTER ANY ICE CONDITIONS IN CASE THIS WAS NOT DONE CORRECTLY. DURING THE DSCNT; WE GOT A MESSAGE OF 'HIGH STAGE VALVE FAILED.' THIS MESSAGE CAME AND WENT A COUPLE OF TIMES. WE SAW IT ON THE PANEL ON THE DSCNT AND THEN A COUPLE OF TIMES ON FINAL APCH TO DFW. WHEN WE ARRIVED IN DFW; WE CONTACTED MAINT AND TOLD THEM WHAT WE SAW. THEY LATER SAID IT LOOKED LIKE THE MAINT GUY IN ZZZ WIRED THE WRONG VALVE; WHICH CONFIRMED TO US THAT WE HAD NO ANTI-ICING CAPABILITIES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.