37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 676114 |
Time | |
Date | 200510 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Beechjet 400 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 108 flight time total : 8817 flight time type : 2747 |
ASRS Report | 676114 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far non adherence : company policies |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Company |
Primary Problem | Company |
Narrative:
I was asked by an assistant program manager of my fleet; if I would mind flying with a pilot who had been out on medical leave. The pilot was returning to the line to fly as a sic. Our company is a part 135 on demand operation. However; we are told our re-position legs are part 91 and that we choose to fly them to part 135 requirements. The sic had not done any takeoffs and lndgs within 6 months; so I was required to fly the passenger legs. The first leg was empty and the sic flew that. The next leg had a passenger; so I flew that leg. The third leg was to an airport with a fairly short runway; so I also flew that leg. After talking in-flight about currency. I queried the company about my sic being out of instrument currency. I was told (after the company doublechked) that my next passenger leg would be flown part 91! After our arrival at sus; I refused to fly anymore! I am starting to realize that a pilot at my fractional cannot take anything for granted -- you must doublechk everyone's work. I feel I cannot trust anyone -- because the pilots are the only ones who are held responsible and have anything to lose. I am reporting the fact that I flew 3 legs with a non instrument current pilot in part 135 operations.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A FRACTIONAL ACR BE400 CAPT FLEW PART 135 WITH A NON CURRENT INST PLT BECAUSE THE ACR DID NOT ADVISE OF THE FO'S STATUS.
Narrative: I WAS ASKED BY AN ASSISTANT PROGRAM MGR OF MY FLEET; IF I WOULD MIND FLYING WITH A PLT WHO HAD BEEN OUT ON MEDICAL LEAVE. THE PLT WAS RETURNING TO THE LINE TO FLY AS A SIC. OUR COMPANY IS A PART 135 ON DEMAND OP. HOWEVER; WE ARE TOLD OUR RE-POS LEGS ARE PART 91 AND THAT WE CHOOSE TO FLY THEM TO PART 135 REQUIREMENTS. THE SIC HAD NOT DONE ANY TKOFS AND LNDGS WITHIN 6 MONTHS; SO I WAS REQUIRED TO FLY THE PAX LEGS. THE FIRST LEG WAS EMPTY AND THE SIC FLEW THAT. THE NEXT LEG HAD A PAX; SO I FLEW THAT LEG. THE THIRD LEG WAS TO AN ARPT WITH A FAIRLY SHORT RWY; SO I ALSO FLEW THAT LEG. AFTER TALKING INFLT ABOUT CURRENCY. I QUERIED THE COMPANY ABOUT MY SIC BEING OUT OF INST CURRENCY. I WAS TOLD (AFTER THE COMPANY DOUBLECHKED) THAT MY NEXT PAX LEG WOULD BE FLOWN PART 91! AFTER OUR ARR AT SUS; I REFUSED TO FLY ANYMORE! I AM STARTING TO REALIZE THAT A PLT AT MY FRACTIONAL CANNOT TAKE ANYTHING FOR GRANTED -- YOU MUST DOUBLECHK EVERYONE'S WORK. I FEEL I CANNOT TRUST ANYONE -- BECAUSE THE PLTS ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO ARE HELD RESPONSIBLE AND HAVE ANYTHING TO LOSE. I AM RPTING THE FACT THAT I FLEW 3 LEGS WITH A NON INST CURRENT PLT IN PART 135 OPS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.