37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 682991 |
Time | |
Date | 200601 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sea.airport |
State Reference | WA |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
ASRS Report | 682991 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
ASRS Report | 682986 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe maintenance problem : improper documentation maintenance problem : improper maintenance maintenance problem : non compliance with mel non adherence : company policies non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : inspection |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Narrative:
Maintenance had disabled one of the ignition system to conduct a check. When the check was completed; one of the maintenance collars around the circuit breaker of an igniter was inadvertently left on; disabling that igniter. The airplane X was turned over to us in this condition. I failed to notice the disabled igniter; and the unairworthy condition of my flight(south); during my preflight of the flight deck. The first officer; still in his first yr at air carrier; did notice the disabled circuit breaker; but believed it to be part of a routinely disabled system. He did not recognize the unairworthy condition. I pushed back with an unairworthy aircraft because one half of at least one ignition system was inoperative as a result of the related circuit breaker being intentionally disabled by maintenance and then not returned to the functioning position after the check was over. The engine(south) started normally. I flew this aircraft for 2 legs with it in this condition. The captain; who accepted the aircraft from me once we returned to seattle; noticed what I had failed to detect.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLT CREW OF MD80 FAIL TO RECOGNIZE COLLARED AND TAGGED IGNITION CIRCUIT BREAKER THAT WAS THE RESULT OF AN INCOMPLETE MAINT PROC. FLY 2 LEGS IN AN UNAIRWORTHY CONFIGN AS A RESULT.
Narrative: MAINT HAD DISABLED ONE OF THE IGNITION SYS TO CONDUCT A CHK. WHEN THE CHK WAS COMPLETED; ONE OF THE MAINT COLLARS AROUND THE CIRCUIT BREAKER OF AN IGNITER WAS INADVERTENTLY LEFT ON; DISABLING THAT IGNITER. THE AIRPLANE X WAS TURNED OVER TO US IN THIS CONDITION. I FAILED TO NOTICE THE DISABLED IGNITER; AND THE UNAIRWORTHY CONDITION OF MY FLT(S); DURING MY PREFLT OF THE FLT DECK. THE FO; STILL IN HIS FIRST YR AT ACR; DID NOTICE THE DISABLED CIRCUIT BREAKER; BUT BELIEVED IT TO BE PART OF A ROUTINELY DISABLED SYS. HE DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE UNAIRWORTHY CONDITION. I PUSHED BACK WITH AN UNAIRWORTHY ACFT BECAUSE ONE HALF OF AT LEAST ONE IGNITION SYS WAS INOP AS A RESULT OF THE RELATED CIRCUIT BREAKER BEING INTENTIONALLY DISABLED BY MAINT AND THEN NOT RETURNED TO THE FUNCTIONING POS AFTER THE CHK WAS OVER. THE ENG(S) STARTED NORMALLY. I FLEW THIS ACFT FOR 2 LEGS WITH IT IN THIS CONDITION. THE CAPT; WHO ACCEPTED THE ACFT FROM ME ONCE WE RETURNED TO SEATTLE; NOTICED WHAT I HAD FAILED TO DETECT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.