37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 701260 |
Time | |
Date | 200606 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | msl single value : 32000 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zzz.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B777-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
ASRS Report | 701260 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : non compliance with mel maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other other : 3 |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : diverted to another airport other |
Consequence | other other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Chart Or Publication Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
We departed ZZZ1 with the aft lavatory vacuum system deferred 'lavatories not to be used below FL180.' about 2 hours into the flight; cabin attendants reported some lavatories were not properly and were filling up with waste. I had a pilot on rest break go through the cabin and investigate the problem. After messaging maintenance control with the problem and further checking in the cabin; we determined that all the lavatories on the aft system were not flushing properly. They would drain liquid but there was not enough vacuum to completely remove the solid waste and they were clogging up. We communicated with maintenance control and dispatch and with further investigation discovered that all the working lavatories were draining into the same holding tank and it was filling at a rate that would have it full before 1/2 the flight time to ZZZ2. After consulting with maintenance control and dispatch we diverted to ZZZ. WX conditions and runways available at ZZZ made making an overweight landing an acceptable option. I made an overweight landing runway 9R ZZZ and parked where the ZZZ staff were ready to accommodate our passenger with a new aircraft and crew. Communication with the company was good -- maintenance control in determining that this was a problem that could not be worked around and allow continuation of the flight; and dispatch in coordinating the diversion; and both in the decision that the overweight landing was an acceptable option.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B777-200 HAD THE AFT LAVATORY VACUUM SYS DEFERRED AS INOP PER THE MEL. DURING FLT; AFT LAVATORIES BECAME UNUSABLE. DIVERTED FOR PLANE CHANGE.
Narrative: WE DEPARTED ZZZ1 WITH THE AFT LAVATORY VACUUM SYS DEFERRED 'LAVATORIES NOT TO BE USED BELOW FL180.' ABOUT 2 HRS INTO THE FLT; CABIN ATTENDANTS RPTED SOME LAVATORIES WERE NOT PROPERLY AND WERE FILLING UP WITH WASTE. I HAD A PLT ON REST BREAK GO THROUGH THE CABIN AND INVESTIGATE THE PROB. AFTER MESSAGING MAINT CTL WITH THE PROB AND FURTHER CHKING IN THE CABIN; WE DETERMINED THAT ALL THE LAVATORIES ON THE AFT SYS WERE NOT FLUSHING PROPERLY. THEY WOULD DRAIN LIQUID BUT THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH VACUUM TO COMPLETELY REMOVE THE SOLID WASTE AND THEY WERE CLOGGING UP. WE COMMUNICATED WITH MAINT CTL AND DISPATCH AND WITH FURTHER INVESTIGATION DISCOVERED THAT ALL THE WORKING LAVATORIES WERE DRAINING INTO THE SAME HOLDING TANK AND IT WAS FILLING AT A RATE THAT WOULD HAVE IT FULL BEFORE 1/2 THE FLT TIME TO ZZZ2. AFTER CONSULTING WITH MAINT CTL AND DISPATCH WE DIVERTED TO ZZZ. WX CONDITIONS AND RWYS AVAILABLE AT ZZZ MADE MAKING AN OVERWT LNDG AN ACCEPTABLE OPTION. I MADE AN OVERWT LNDG RWY 9R ZZZ AND PARKED WHERE THE ZZZ STAFF WERE READY TO ACCOMMODATE OUR PAX WITH A NEW ACFT AND CREW. COM WITH THE COMPANY WAS GOOD -- MAINT CTL IN DETERMINING THAT THIS WAS A PROB THAT COULD NOT BE WORKED AROUND AND ALLOW CONTINUATION OF THE FLT; AND DISPATCH IN COORDINATING THE DIVERSION; AND BOTH IN THE DECISION THAT THE OVERWT LNDG WAS AN ACCEPTABLE OPTION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.