37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 701875 |
Time | |
Date | 200601 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 135 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | oversight : coordinator |
ASRS Report | 701875 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | other personnel other |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper maintenance maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : inspection performance deficiency : logbook entry |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Chart Or Publication Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
Air carrier X has a time deferred maintenance item that reads as follows: 'right-hand aileron trailing has lightning strike damage/speed tape applied.' captain performed general visual inspection of the damage on the r-hand aileron every 250 flight cycles and if damage presents evolution repair immediately. When doing the time deferred maintenance item back in january; I inadvertently entered days instead of cycles. The problem was not caught until (date) when my maintenance operations director brought this to my attention with a correction report file. When questioned why I could possibly have done this; I told informed him that it being so long ago I cannot give a good answer; but that I could only assume I was really; really busy. I know how to do time deferred maintenance items very well and that would be my only reason why this happened. It gets very busy here most days and sometimes we are shorthanded. Not an excuse for mistakes; but this is my best guess why. I do time deferred maintenance items every day and this is a first time this has happened to me (to my knowledge).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN EMB135 WITH A TIME DELAYED MAINT ITEM ON LIGHTNING STRIKE DAMAGE TO THE R AILERON WAS DEFERRED WITH INSPECTIONS EVERY 250 CYCLES. THE RPTR INADVERTENTLY ENTERED DAYS INSTEAD OF CYCLES. TIME WAS OVERFLOWN.
Narrative: ACR X HAS A TIME DEFERRED MAINT ITEM THAT READS AS FOLLOWS: 'R-HAND AILERON TRAILING HAS LIGHTNING STRIKE DAMAGE/SPD TAPE APPLIED.' CAPT PERFORMED GENERAL VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE DAMAGE ON THE R-HAND AILERON EVERY 250 FLT CYCLES AND IF DAMAGE PRESENTS EVOLUTION REPAIR IMMEDIATELY. WHEN DOING THE TIME DEFERRED MAINT ITEM BACK IN JANUARY; I INADVERTENTLY ENTERED DAYS INSTEAD OF CYCLES. THE PROB WAS NOT CAUGHT UNTIL (DATE) WHEN MY MAINT OPS DIRECTOR BROUGHT THIS TO MY ATTN WITH A CORRECTION RPT FILE. WHEN QUESTIONED WHY I COULD POSSIBLY HAVE DONE THIS; I TOLD INFORMED HIM THAT IT BEING SO LONG AGO I CANNOT GIVE A GOOD ANSWER; BUT THAT I COULD ONLY ASSUME I WAS REALLY; REALLY BUSY. I KNOW HOW TO DO TIME DEFERRED MAINT ITEMS VERY WELL AND THAT WOULD BE MY ONLY REASON WHY THIS HAPPENED. IT GETS VERY BUSY HERE MOST DAYS AND SOMETIMES WE ARE SHORTHANDED. NOT AN EXCUSE FOR MISTAKES; BUT THIS IS MY BEST GUESS WHY. I DO TIME DEFERRED MAINT ITEMS EVERY DAY AND THIS IS A FIRST TIME THIS HAS HAPPENED TO ME (TO MY KNOWLEDGE).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.