37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 705056 |
Time | |
Date | 200607 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : zzz.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B777 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : taxi |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
ASRS Report | 705056 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : published procedure non adherence : company policies |
Independent Detector | other other : 1 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : manuals performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Company Chart Or Publication Maintenance Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Company |
Narrative:
On jul/thu/06 at approximately XA00 I was assigned to move aircraft X from international terminal X to terminal Y gate X for the flight ab departure at ZZZ. I was the right seat operator. Prior to leaving terminal X; the cabin cleaning crew requested to remain on board the aircraft for taxi to the departure gate. I agreed with the left seat operator to allow them to remain on board. This decision was based on data contained in computer based training course titled safe aircraft movement; as well as gpm. Following the guidelines of the case and the gpm; the cleaning crew was instructed to remain seated with their seatbelts fastened. The aircraft movement was completed safely with no events. Upon reviewing the gpm; company and crash fire rescue equipment part 121 this morning (jul/mon/06) for additional clarity on aircraft movement with service personnel on board; some safety concerns were raised in relation to the above event: 1) had an emergency event occurred; service personnel (cabin cleaners; contract or company) are not formally trained on emergency assignments or emergency egress of any aircraft fleet types. 2) taxi crew amt's are not required/trained to brief cabin occupants on emergency egress of aircraft and assigned emergency procedures. 3) emergency egress of aircraft and emergency assignments are not contained in any of the amt taxi tow training for fleet type courses X; Y; or Z; for our own safety or to even brief cabin occupants with. 4) company course X and gpm seem to be in conflict with gpm subsection which does not allow an amt to conduct operations with passenger on board. 5) no definitive list exists that is readily accessible to maintenance taxi crews for determination of who is eligible to remain onboard an aircraft during maintenance taxi operations. 6)emergency egress of aircraft and emergency assignment training exists for flight crews; yet amt taxi crews and service personnel receive none while operating in virtually the same environment.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B777 BEING TAXING TO ANOTHER GATE BY TECHNICIANS THAT QUESTION LEGAL AND SAFETY CONCERNS WHEN CARRYING COMPANY CLEANING PERSONNEL.
Narrative: ON JUL/THU/06 AT APPROX XA00 I WAS ASSIGNED TO MOVE ACFT X FROM INTL TERMINAL X TO TERMINAL Y GATE X FOR THE FLT AB DEP AT ZZZ. I WAS THE R SEAT OPERATOR. PRIOR TO LEAVING TERMINAL X; THE CABIN CLEANING CREW REQUESTED TO REMAIN ON BOARD THE ACFT FOR TAXI TO THE DEP GATE. I AGREED WITH THE L SEAT OPERATOR TO ALLOW THEM TO REMAIN ON BOARD. THIS DECISION WAS BASED ON DATA CONTAINED IN COMPUTER BASED TRAINING COURSE TITLED SAFE ACFT MOVEMENT; AS WELL AS GPM. FOLLOWING THE GUIDELINES OF THE CASE AND THE GPM; THE CLEANING CREW WAS INSTRUCTED TO REMAIN SEATED WITH THEIR SEATBELTS FASTENED. THE ACFT MOVEMENT WAS COMPLETED SAFELY WITH NO EVENTS. UPON REVIEWING THE GPM; COMPANY AND CFR PART 121 THIS MORNING (JUL/MON/06) FOR ADDITIONAL CLARITY ON ACFT MOVEMENT WITH SVC PERSONNEL ON BOARD; SOME SAFETY CONCERNS WERE RAISED IN RELATION TO THE ABOVE EVENT: 1) HAD AN EMER EVENT OCCURRED; SVC PERSONNEL (CABIN CLEANERS; CONTRACT OR COMPANY) ARE NOT FORMALLY TRAINED ON EMER ASSIGNMENTS OR EMER EGRESS OF ANY ACFT FLEET TYPES. 2) TAXI CREW AMT'S ARE NOT REQUIRED/TRAINED TO BRIEF CABIN OCCUPANTS ON EMER EGRESS OF ACFT AND ASSIGNED EMER PROCS. 3) EMER EGRESS OF ACFT AND EMER ASSIGNMENTS ARE NOT CONTAINED IN ANY OF THE AMT TAXI TOW TRAINING FOR FLEET TYPE COURSES X; Y; OR Z; FOR OUR OWN SAFETY OR TO EVEN BRIEF CABIN OCCUPANTS WITH. 4) COMPANY COURSE X AND GPM SEEM TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH GPM SUBSECTION WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW AN AMT TO CONDUCT OPS WITH PAX ON BOARD. 5) NO DEFINITIVE LIST EXISTS THAT IS READILY ACCESSIBLE TO MAINT TAXI CREWS FOR DETERMINATION OF WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO REMAIN ONBOARD AN ACFT DURING MAINT TAXI OPS. 6)EMER EGRESS OF ACFT AND EMER ASSIGNMENT TRAINING EXISTS FOR FLT CREWS; YET AMT TAXI CREWS AND SVC PERSONNEL RECEIVE NONE WHILE OPERATING IN VIRTUALLY THE SAME ENVIRONMENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.