37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 709791 |
Time | |
Date | 200609 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-83 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
ASRS Report | 709791 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | oversight : supervisor |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper maintenance non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other other : 3 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | performance deficiency : training performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft Chart Or Publication |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
Aircraft had been in hangar for a few days with the problem of the center tank not feeding the engines when it reached 4000 pounds of fuel. The volute had been changed the day of and there was some confusion as to whether that had repaired the problem or not. It was determined that perhaps we should change the inboard main tank boost pump on the right wing; which I did; and the power was off the aircraft because there was no other work going on with myself being the only one working on the airplane. At this point I found out that the new pump I was planning on installing had a bent pin on it and could not be installed. We then ordered a new pump; which we didn't have in stock and would be some time before we got it. A few hours later; I was told by my supervisor that the FAA was asking why the circuit breakers for the boost pumps were not pulled. So with power off the airplane I failed to pull the circuit breakers as the maintenance manual says I should have done. I then immediately pulled the appropriate circuit breakers as required in the maintenance manual and explained what I had done to the inspector.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN MD83 TECHNICIAN REPLACING A R WING INBOARD BOOST PUMP WITH NO PWR ON THE AIRPLANE WAS QUESTIONED BY AN FAA SAFETY INSPECTOR WHY THE CIRCUIT BREAKERS WERE NOT PULLED AND TAGGED. MAINT MANUAL REQUIRES CIRCUIT BREAKERS PULLED.
Narrative: ACFT HAD BEEN IN HANGAR FOR A FEW DAYS WITH THE PROB OF THE CTR TANK NOT FEEDING THE ENGS WHEN IT REACHED 4000 LBS OF FUEL. THE VOLUTE HAD BEEN CHANGED THE DAY OF AND THERE WAS SOME CONFUSION AS TO WHETHER THAT HAD REPAIRED THE PROB OR NOT. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT PERHAPS WE SHOULD CHANGE THE INBOARD MAIN TANK BOOST PUMP ON THE R WING; WHICH I DID; AND THE PWR WAS OFF THE ACFT BECAUSE THERE WAS NO OTHER WORK GOING ON WITH MYSELF BEING THE ONLY ONE WORKING ON THE AIRPLANE. AT THIS POINT I FOUND OUT THAT THE NEW PUMP I WAS PLANNING ON INSTALLING HAD A BENT PIN ON IT AND COULD NOT BE INSTALLED. WE THEN ORDERED A NEW PUMP; WHICH WE DIDN'T HAVE IN STOCK AND WOULD BE SOME TIME BEFORE WE GOT IT. A FEW HRS LATER; I WAS TOLD BY MY SUPVR THAT THE FAA WAS ASKING WHY THE CIRCUIT BREAKERS FOR THE BOOST PUMPS WERE NOT PULLED. SO WITH PWR OFF THE AIRPLANE I FAILED TO PULL THE CIRCUIT BREAKERS AS THE MAINT MANUAL SAYS I SHOULD HAVE DONE. I THEN IMMEDIATELY PULLED THE APPROPRIATE CIRCUIT BREAKERS AS REQUIRED IN THE MAINT MANUAL AND EXPLAINED WHAT I HAD DONE TO THE INSPECTOR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.