37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 710174 |
Time | |
Date | 200609 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lou.airport |
State Reference | KY |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : ground |
Experience | controller non radar : 5 controller time certified in position2 : 8 flight time total : 238 |
ASRS Report | 710174 |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airport |
Primary Problem | Airport |
Situations | |
Airport | markings : lou.airport |
Narrative:
Refer to lou airport diagram. Airport has just finished resurfacing and repainting of runway 14/32 at lou. Upon returning to work today; I noticed the contractors had painted a taxiway line directly across runway 14/32 at the 'hotel' intersection. In addition; there are no lead-in taxi lines painted. Only a single taxiway line directly across runway 14/32. This was pointed out to the regional airport authority/authorized vehicle on ground frequency; who claimed that all markings were 'in accordance with standard FAA airport markings.' to be honest; this may be true; but I've been a cpc at 2 airports; and worked for a year at another major airport; flown into many airports around the USA and have never seen a taxiway line cross a runway. Lead-in lines of course; but never crossing a runway. Given the recent accident at lex; I contacted the FSDO office in lou about the issue. I have not yet heard back from them; and since we're a small airport; I guess I really don't expect to. The controllers here feel that this non-standard taxiway/runway markings will be confusing to the large student pilot population here at lou; and may confuse other users as well. We fear that this non-standard marking could lead to a runway incursion if not corrected. A memo of this issue has been given to the manager and supervisor at lou ATCT; and I have called the FAA's safety hotline as well.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GND CTLR AT LOU RPTS TXWY CTRLINE MARKINGS ON 'H' INTXN EXTEND THROUGH FRESHLY RESURFACED RWY 14-32. FEARS POTENTIAL RWY INCURSIONS MAY RESULT.
Narrative: REFER TO LOU ARPT DIAGRAM. ARPT HAS JUST FINISHED RESURFACING AND REPAINTING OF RWY 14/32 AT LOU. UPON RETURNING TO WORK TODAY; I NOTICED THE CONTRACTORS HAD PAINTED A TXWY LINE DIRECTLY ACROSS RWY 14/32 AT THE 'HOTEL' INTXN. IN ADDITION; THERE ARE NO LEAD-IN TAXI LINES PAINTED. ONLY A SINGLE TXWY LINE DIRECTLY ACROSS RWY 14/32. THIS WAS POINTED OUT TO THE REGIONAL ARPT AUTH VEHICLE ON GND FREQ; WHO CLAIMED THAT ALL MARKINGS WERE 'IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD FAA ARPT MARKINGS.' TO BE HONEST; THIS MAY BE TRUE; BUT I'VE BEEN A CPC AT 2 ARPTS; AND WORKED FOR A YEAR AT ANOTHER MAJOR ARPT; FLOWN INTO MANY ARPTS AROUND THE USA AND HAVE NEVER SEEN A TXWY LINE CROSS A RWY. LEAD-IN LINES OF COURSE; BUT NEVER XING A RWY. GIVEN THE RECENT ACCIDENT AT LEX; I CONTACTED THE FSDO OFFICE IN LOU ABOUT THE ISSUE. I HAVE NOT YET HEARD BACK FROM THEM; AND SINCE WE'RE A SMALL ARPT; I GUESS I REALLY DON'T EXPECT TO. THE CTLRS HERE FEEL THAT THIS NON-STANDARD TXWY/RWY MARKINGS WILL BE CONFUSING TO THE LARGE STUDENT PLT POPULATION HERE AT LOU; AND MAY CONFUSE OTHER USERS AS WELL. WE FEAR THAT THIS NON-STANDARD MARKING COULD LEAD TO A RWY INCURSION IF NOT CORRECTED. A MEMO OF THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE MGR AND SUPVR AT LOU ATCT; AND I HAVE CALLED THE FAA'S SAFETY HOTLINE AS WELL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.