BE40 flies mustang vice reno SID as cleared from rno. Cite difficulties associated with electronic f...

Attributes
ACN	710292
Time
Date	200609
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : rno.airport
State Reference	NV
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tracon : rno.tracon
Operator	common carrier : air taxi
Make Model Name	Beechjet 400
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 135
Navigation In Use	other
Flight Phase	climbout : initial
Route In Use	departure sid : mustang
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air taxi
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 11000 flight time type : 2000
ASRS Report	710292
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air taxi
Function	flight crew : first officer
Events
Anomaly	aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation
Resolutory Action	none taken : anomaly accepted
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Chart Or Publication Flight Crew Human Performance Aircraft
Primary Problem	Ambiguous

Narrative:

Very simply; the first officer received a departure clearance for the reno 3 departure and loaded the mustang 6 departure in the FMS. During the taxi check I asked him to brief the departure. I believe he stated that we had the reno 3; but he read the departure from the mustang departure. I've asked myself how this could happen and how I missed it. The things that I feel contributed to us flying the wrong departure were: 1) we were on day 7 of a busy 8 day tour. We were also on the 5TH leg of a very busy day with short turns. Our day had started early and combined with our cumulative fatigue; we were very tired. 2) the electronic charts we use are a continuing source of frustration to me. We now have a mounting bracket on the copilot's side; which puts the unit directly in the sun. The pilot in the right seat has trouble reading it and the pilot in the left can't see it at all. Had I had a chart that I could see; I may have caught this mistake.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: BE40 FLIES MUSTANG VICE RENO SID AS CLRED FROM RNO. CITE DIFFICULTIES ASSOCIATED WITH ELECTRONIC FLT BAG.

Narrative: VERY SIMPLY; THE FO RECEIVED A DEP CLRNC FOR THE RENO 3 DEP AND LOADED THE MUSTANG 6 DEP IN THE FMS. DURING THE TAXI CHK I ASKED HIM TO BRIEF THE DEP. I BELIEVE HE STATED THAT WE HAD THE RENO 3; BUT HE READ THE DEP FROM THE MUSTANG DEP. I'VE ASKED MYSELF HOW THIS COULD HAPPEN AND HOW I MISSED IT. THE THINGS THAT I FEEL CONTRIBUTED TO US FLYING THE WRONG DEP WERE: 1) WE WERE ON DAY 7 OF A BUSY 8 DAY TOUR. WE WERE ALSO ON THE 5TH LEG OF A VERY BUSY DAY WITH SHORT TURNS. OUR DAY HAD STARTED EARLY AND COMBINED WITH OUR CUMULATIVE FATIGUE; WE WERE VERY TIRED. 2) THE ELECTRONIC CHARTS WE USE ARE A CONTINUING SOURCE OF FRUSTRATION TO ME. WE NOW HAVE A MOUNTING BRACKET ON THE COPLT'S SIDE; WHICH PUTS THE UNIT DIRECTLY IN THE SUN. THE PLT IN THE R SEAT HAS TROUBLE READING IT AND THE PLT IN THE L CAN'T SEE IT AT ALL. HAD I HAD A CHART THAT I COULD SEE; I MAY HAVE CAUGHT THIS MISTAKE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

BE40 flies mustang vice reno SID as cleared from rno. Cite difficulties associated with electronic flight bag.