37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 715830 |
Time | |
Date | 200611 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : frg.airport |
State Reference | NY |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : n90.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Citation II S2/Bravo |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 84 flight time total : 7300 flight time type : 728 |
ASRS Report | 715830 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance FAA |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
We were departing the republic airport in the nyc area. Turned to 010 degrees and was switched to ATC. At some point in the climb; we were cleared to the gayel intersection. As we were climbing out; we realized the intersection distance seemed too far away. About the same time; the controller called and asked us to check the spelling on our waypoint. It turns out we entered gayle which is on a similar heading; but at a much farther distance. We corrected the situation; made a course correction and continued on after thanking the controller for noticing the slightly different heading. I vaguely remembered the controller indicating that this happened from time to time with this intersection name. Looking at a map of nyc; I think it would be easy to drift into protected airspace if we had been given a turn from 010 degrees earlier than we were or had we continued on the incorrect for much longer. Even though the heading changes are minimal; nyc airspace is not a good place to be off course. Lucky for us that the controller immediately recognized our error. While entering the flight plan; we should have rechked the spelling; waypoint distances; and airway connections using various FMS data and graphic tools. I will most certainly be more careful to check entry of flight plans in the future. On the other hand; this intersection is phonetically similar as well as near identical spelling. I think the system lends us to error. I recommend one of the intxns be renamed to ensure this does not continue to happen. If I understood the controller correctly; it has apparently happened more than once.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C550 CREW ENTERS WRONG SPELLING OF INTXN NAME AND GOES OFF COURSE.
Narrative: WE WERE DEPARTING THE REPUBLIC ARPT IN THE NYC AREA. TURNED TO 010 DEGS AND WAS SWITCHED TO ATC. AT SOME POINT IN THE CLB; WE WERE CLRED TO THE GAYEL INTXN. AS WE WERE CLBING OUT; WE REALIZED THE INTXN DISTANCE SEEMED TOO FAR AWAY. ABOUT THE SAME TIME; THE CTLR CALLED AND ASKED US TO CHK THE SPELLING ON OUR WAYPOINT. IT TURNS OUT WE ENTERED GAYLE WHICH IS ON A SIMILAR HDG; BUT AT A MUCH FARTHER DISTANCE. WE CORRECTED THE SITUATION; MADE A COURSE CORRECTION AND CONTINUED ON AFTER THANKING THE CTLR FOR NOTICING THE SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT HDG. I VAGUELY REMEMBERED THE CTLR INDICATING THAT THIS HAPPENED FROM TIME TO TIME WITH THIS INTXN NAME. LOOKING AT A MAP OF NYC; I THINK IT WOULD BE EASY TO DRIFT INTO PROTECTED AIRSPACE IF WE HAD BEEN GIVEN A TURN FROM 010 DEGS EARLIER THAN WE WERE OR HAD WE CONTINUED ON THE INCORRECT FOR MUCH LONGER. EVEN THOUGH THE HDG CHANGES ARE MINIMAL; NYC AIRSPACE IS NOT A GOOD PLACE TO BE OFF COURSE. LUCKY FOR US THAT THE CTLR IMMEDIATELY RECOGNIZED OUR ERROR. WHILE ENTERING THE FLT PLAN; WE SHOULD HAVE RECHKED THE SPELLING; WAYPOINT DISTANCES; AND AIRWAY CONNECTIONS USING VARIOUS FMS DATA AND GRAPHIC TOOLS. I WILL MOST CERTAINLY BE MORE CAREFUL TO CHK ENTRY OF FLT PLANS IN THE FUTURE. ON THE OTHER HAND; THIS INTXN IS PHONETICALLY SIMILAR AS WELL AS NEAR IDENTICAL SPELLING. I THINK THE SYS LENDS US TO ERROR. I RECOMMEND ONE OF THE INTXNS BE RENAMED TO ENSURE THIS DOES NOT CONTINUE TO HAPPEN. IF I UNDERSTOOD THE CTLR CORRECTLY; IT HAS APPARENTLY HAPPENED MORE THAN ONCE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.