37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 717536 |
Time | |
Date | 200611 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | msl single value : 85 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : bhm.tower |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | PA-28 Cherokee/Archer II/Dakota/Pillan/Warrior |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 6500 flight time type : 750 |
ASRS Report | 717536 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : undershoot conflict : airborne critical ground encounters : vehicle non adherence : far other anomaly |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
As the assistant chief of a part 141 school; I was conducting an annual part 141 instructor check ride. I asked for a simulated emergency approach and landing from pattern altitude. The CFI flying the airplane was to perform the maneuver and instruct at the same time. I noticed that the turn to the runway was late but by holding flap extension to 10 degrees and flying a tight pattern; it appeared we would make the runway. A road crosses at the end of the runway and as we passed over the road; a van was directly beneath us and the right tire contacted the roof of the van. I felt a bump but did not see the vehicle which came from the right side. The landing was uneventful. The aircraft sustained no damage but subsequently a van came to the refueling pumps and we were shown a damaged spot on the roof of the van where the tire hit. There were no injuries. The cause of this incident was a poor approach pattern followed by a low and slow approach on final leading to a sink rate greater than expected. I should have intervened and called for power and a go around as soon as I noticed a poor pattern and not allowed this simulated maneuver to turn into a real incident.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A PLT RECEIVING AN INSTRUCTOR'S CHK RIDE DID AN UNINTENTIONAL LOW APCH AND AN ACFT TIRE CONTACTED A VEHICLE ROOF ON SHORT FINAL.
Narrative: AS THE ASSISTANT CHIEF OF A PART 141 SCHOOL; I WAS CONDUCTING AN ANNUAL PART 141 INSTRUCTOR CHK RIDE. I ASKED FOR A SIMULATED EMER APCH AND LNDG FROM PATTERN ALT. THE CFI FLYING THE AIRPLANE WAS TO PERFORM THE MANEUVER AND INSTRUCT AT THE SAME TIME. I NOTICED THAT THE TURN TO THE RWY WAS LATE BUT BY HOLDING FLAP EXTENSION TO 10 DEGS AND FLYING A TIGHT PATTERN; IT APPEARED WE WOULD MAKE THE RWY. A ROAD CROSSES AT THE END OF THE RWY AND AS WE PASSED OVER THE ROAD; A VAN WAS DIRECTLY BENEATH US AND THE R TIRE CONTACTED THE ROOF OF THE VAN. I FELT A BUMP BUT DID NOT SEE THE VEHICLE WHICH CAME FROM THE R SIDE. THE LNDG WAS UNEVENTFUL. THE ACFT SUSTAINED NO DAMAGE BUT SUBSEQUENTLY A VAN CAME TO THE REFUELING PUMPS AND WE WERE SHOWN A DAMAGED SPOT ON THE ROOF OF THE VAN WHERE THE TIRE HIT. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE CAUSE OF THIS INCIDENT WAS A POOR APCH PATTERN FOLLOWED BY A LOW AND SLOW APCH ON FINAL LEADING TO A SINK RATE GREATER THAN EXPECTED. I SHOULD HAVE INTERVENED AND CALLED FOR PWR AND A GAR AS SOON AS I NOTICED A POOR PATTERN AND NOT ALLOWED THIS SIMULATED MANEUVER TO TURN INTO A REAL INCIDENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.