37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 726582 |
Time | |
Date | 200702 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | landing : roll |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 22.9 flight time total : 2710 flight time type : 700 |
ASRS Report | 726582 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe ground encounters : gear up landing non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : investigated other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
We had a gear up landing. My fault. Suggestion: when wearing noise cancelling ear phones; the gear warning should be wired into the audio system.callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated that the sequence of events leading up to the incident caused him to become distracted. He had just entered the VFR traffic pattern and was asked by ATC to slow his aircraft and then follow a slower aircraft. That ATC call; his verbal response; and aircraft control reaction occurred at the point in his normal pattern flow where he would have lowered the landing gear. He subsequently forgot to go back to the checklist and review it because he was concentrating on flying the aircraft at a reduced airspeed. His aircraft does not have visual gear indicator lights in addition to the horn but again he was distracted and simply failed to review the checklist and his normal process. In addition to wearing the noise cancelling headset; he does have a hearing loss that complicates his situation. The noise cancelling headset is worn in order to protect his hearing but at the same time it masks needed information.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN SMA PLT LANDED GEAR UP WHILE WEARING A NOISE CANCELLING HEADSET; SUGGESTING; WIRING THE GEAR WARNING INTO THE ACFT AUDIO SYSTEMS.
Narrative: WE HAD A GEAR UP LNDG. MY FAULT. SUGGESTION: WHEN WEARING NOISE CANCELLING EAR PHONES; THE GEAR WARNING SHOULD BE WIRED INTO THE AUDIO SYSTEM.CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THAT THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS LEADING UP TO THE INCIDENT CAUSED HIM TO BECOME DISTRACTED. HE HAD JUST ENTERED THE VFR TFC PATTERN AND WAS ASKED BY ATC TO SLOW HIS ACFT AND THEN FOLLOW A SLOWER ACFT. THAT ATC CALL; HIS VERBAL RESPONSE; AND ACFT CTL REACTION OCCURRED AT THE POINT IN HIS NORMAL PATTERN FLOW WHERE HE WOULD HAVE LOWERED THE LNDG GEAR. HE SUBSEQUENTLY FORGOT TO GO BACK TO THE CHKLIST AND REVIEW IT BECAUSE HE WAS CONCENTRATING ON FLYING THE ACFT AT A REDUCED AIRSPD. HIS ACFT DOES NOT HAVE VISUAL GEAR INDICATOR LIGHTS IN ADDITION TO THE HORN BUT AGAIN HE WAS DISTRACTED AND SIMPLY FAILED TO REVIEW THE CHKLIST AND HIS NORMAL PROCESS. IN ADDITION TO WEARING THE NOISE CANCELLING HEADSET; HE DOES HAVE A HEARING LOSS THAT COMPLICATES HIS SITUATION. THE NOISE CANCELLING HEADSET IS WORN IN ORDER TO PROTECT HIS HEARING BUT AT THE SAME TIME IT MASKS NEEDED INFO.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.