37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 734323 |
Time | |
Date | 200704 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : cri.vor |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | msl single value : 5000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : n90.tracon tower : zzzz.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other vortac |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Route In Use | departure sid : kennedy |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 290 flight time total : 8000 flight time type : 5400 |
ASRS Report | 734323 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 9000 flight time type : 4000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Company Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance Chart Or Publication |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Narrative:
During the climb and sse of cri; departure asked if we were flying the 'fly over your house departure?' we'd departed runway 31L and out of 400 ft AGL began the turn direct to cri. I was in green data with the cri VOR 176 degree radial dialed in. I was using the bearing pointer #1 to track direct to cri. We retracted the flaps and gear on schedule. Inside 3.0 DME cri; I began a turn outbound to join the cri 176 degree radial. At about 4000 ft MSL the controller posed his question to us and another company flight. Both of us were told cri is considered a flyover point on the kennedy 1. Nothing on the kennedy 1 specifies cri as a flyover point. Current company guidance emphasizes if a turn is initiated when the 'to/from' pointer changes to the 'from;' cri has been overshot. I've used the technique specified above (and in air carrier X's guidance) multiple times and never been questioned. This incident was the first time cri was described as a flyover fix. If cri is a flyover fix (similar to an RNAV flyover waypoint); will this requirement be addressed in future revisions of the departure procedure?
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ200 CREW TURNS INSIDE CRI ON THE KENNEDY 1 DEPARTURE OUT OF JFK.
Narrative: DURING THE CLB AND SSE OF CRI; DEP ASKED IF WE WERE FLYING THE 'FLY OVER YOUR HOUSE DEP?' WE'D DEPARTED RWY 31L AND OUT OF 400 FT AGL BEGAN THE TURN DIRECT TO CRI. I WAS IN GREEN DATA WITH THE CRI VOR 176 DEG RADIAL DIALED IN. I WAS USING THE BEARING POINTER #1 TO TRACK DIRECT TO CRI. WE RETRACTED THE FLAPS AND GEAR ON SCHEDULE. INSIDE 3.0 DME CRI; I BEGAN A TURN OUTBOUND TO JOIN THE CRI 176 DEG RADIAL. AT ABOUT 4000 FT MSL THE CTLR POSED HIS QUESTION TO US AND ANOTHER COMPANY FLT. BOTH OF US WERE TOLD CRI IS CONSIDERED A FLYOVER POINT ON THE KENNEDY 1. NOTHING ON THE KENNEDY 1 SPECIFIES CRI AS A FLYOVER POINT. CURRENT COMPANY GUIDANCE EMPHASIZES IF A TURN IS INITIATED WHEN THE 'TO/FROM' POINTER CHANGES TO THE 'FROM;' CRI HAS BEEN OVERSHOT. I'VE USED THE TECHNIQUE SPECIFIED ABOVE (AND IN ACR X'S GUIDANCE) MULTIPLE TIMES AND NEVER BEEN QUESTIONED. THIS INCIDENT WAS THE FIRST TIME CRI WAS DESCRIBED AS A FLYOVER FIX. IF CRI IS A FLYOVER FIX (SIMILAR TO AN RNAV FLYOVER WAYPOINT); WILL THIS REQUIREMENT BE ADDRESSED IN FUTURE REVISIONS OF THE DEP PROC?
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.