37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 742975 |
Time | |
Date | 200706 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | msl single value : 2900 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : zzz.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | M-20 Series Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Route In Use | departure : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 35 flight time total : 650 flight time type : 350 |
ASRS Report | 742975 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical altitude deviation : overshoot non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : autoplt uncommanded clb-dive |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : regained aircraft control flight crew : overrode automation flight crew : overcame equipment problem |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Company Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
I departed ZZZ in new aircraft I just purchased. I was talking to approach; who assigned me; 'right turn to 120 degrees; climb 2000 ft.' moments later an additional vector; 'right turn 270 degrees.' this was a 150 degree turn; which I think caused the autoplt to malfunction. The autoplt; an s-tec 55X; did not stop at the altitude pre-select altitude setting of 2000 ft but rather climbed to 2900 ft. At this point; the autoplt seemed to register the altitude; and subsequently put the plane into a steep dive. I immediately disconnected the autoplt and corrected the altitude with no delay. One problem that stands out is that when turning to 270 degrees; which was the 150 degree turn; the autoplt put the plane into a bank; much steeper than usually experienced; and seemingly delaying the altitude pre-select setting. Later in the flight while in level cruise; the autoplt seemed to constantly rock the wings. I subsequently checked with someone who has flown the plane and they had the same problem.callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated he recently purchased his new mooney 'acclaim;' and installed the s-tec 55X autoplt because the G-1000 garmin panel; which incorporates the garmin gfc -700 autopilot system with a new multi-functional display unit; was not certified for the mooney 'acclaim' at the time. Reporter also stated; as a result of his experience with the s-tec 55X and a recent previous user of his aircraft having the same experience; he is replacing the s-tec 55X with the now available garmin 1000 (GFC700).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A NEW MOONEY ACCLAIM M20TN ACFT WITH S-TEC MODEL 55X AUTOPILOT COMPUTER EXPERIENCED UNCOMMANDED ALTITUDE CLIMB AND STEEP DIVE DURING TKOF CLIMB AND WINGS ROCKING DURING LEVEL CRUISE.
Narrative: I DEPARTED ZZZ IN NEW ACFT I JUST PURCHASED. I WAS TALKING TO APCH; WHO ASSIGNED ME; 'RIGHT TURN TO 120 DEGS; CLB 2000 FT.' MOMENTS LATER AN ADDITIONAL VECTOR; 'RIGHT TURN 270 DEGS.' THIS WAS A 150 DEG TURN; WHICH I THINK CAUSED THE AUTOPLT TO MALFUNCTION. THE AUTOPLT; AN S-TEC 55X; DID NOT STOP AT THE ALT PRE-SELECT ALT SETTING OF 2000 FT BUT RATHER CLBED TO 2900 FT. AT THIS POINT; THE AUTOPLT SEEMED TO REGISTER THE ALT; AND SUBSEQUENTLY PUT THE PLANE INTO A STEEP DIVE. I IMMEDIATELY DISCONNECTED THE AUTOPLT AND CORRECTED THE ALT WITH NO DELAY. ONE PROB THAT STANDS OUT IS THAT WHEN TURNING TO 270 DEGS; WHICH WAS THE 150 DEG TURN; THE AUTOPLT PUT THE PLANE INTO A BANK; MUCH STEEPER THAN USUALLY EXPERIENCED; AND SEEMINGLY DELAYING THE ALT PRE-SELECT SETTING. LATER IN THE FLT WHILE IN LEVEL CRUISE; THE AUTOPLT SEEMED TO CONSTANTLY ROCK THE WINGS. I SUBSEQUENTLY CHECKED WITH SOMEONE WHO HAS FLOWN THE PLANE AND THEY HAD THE SAME PROB.CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: REPORTER STATED HE RECENTLY PURCHASED HIS NEW MOONEY 'ACCLAIM;' AND INSTALLED THE S-TEC 55X AUTOPLT BECAUSE THE G-1000 GARMIN PANEL; WHICH INCORPORATES THE GARMIN GFC -700 AUTOPILOT SYSTEM WITH A NEW MULTI-FUNCTIONAL DISPLAY UNIT; WAS NOT CERTIFIED FOR THE MOONEY 'ACCLAIM' AT THE TIME. REPORTER ALSO STATED; AS A RESULT OF HIS EXPERIENCE WITH THE S-TEC 55X AND A RECENT PREVIOUS USER OF HIS ACFT HAVING THE SAME EXPERIENCE; HE IS REPLACING THE S-TEC 55X WITH THE NOW AVAILABLE GARMIN 1000 (GFC700).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.