37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 748644 |
Time | |
Date | 200706 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : mgw.vortac |
State Reference | WV |
Altitude | msl single value : 20000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zdc.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : vacating altitude |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 80 flight time type : 5000 |
ASRS Report | 748644 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : eicas other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Chart Or Publication |
Primary Problem | Chart Or Publication |
Narrative:
During descent; 'WS1 heat fail' EICAS caution activated. Message cleared; then reactivated; then cleared several times; then illuminated steady. In attempting to run the QRH procedure; it was discovered that it was written so ambiguously as to be of no help whatsoever. Indeed; it introduced a significant measure of uncertainty regarding what the proper course of action should be. We interpreted it to the best of our ability and did what we thought was best; given the inadequate guidance. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated that the procedure specifies that the window heat switch be turned off for 15 second; then back on. If the EICAS message persists; power should be removed from the associated bus after landing. Did the condition refer to the presence of an EICAS message with the switch on or off? He stated that the airline is contacting the manufacturer for clarification.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EMB-145 WINDOW HEAT FAILED DURING FLT. FLT CREW FOLLOWED PROCEDURE TO DEAL WITH ANOMALY; BUT DISCOVERED THE PROCEDURE TO BE AMBIGUOUS.
Narrative: DURING DSCNT; 'WS1 HEAT FAIL' EICAS CAUTION ACTIVATED. MESSAGE CLRED; THEN REACTIVATED; THEN CLRED SEVERAL TIMES; THEN ILLUMINATED STEADY. IN ATTEMPTING TO RUN THE QRH PROC; IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT IT WAS WRITTEN SO AMBIGUOUSLY AS TO BE OF NO HELP WHATSOEVER. INDEED; IT INTRODUCED A SIGNIFICANT MEASURE OF UNCERTAINTY REGARDING WHAT THE PROPER COURSE OF ACTION SHOULD BE. WE INTERPED IT TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY AND DID WHAT WE THOUGHT WAS BEST; GIVEN THE INADEQUATE GUIDANCE. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: REPORTER STATED THAT THE PROCEDURE SPECIFIES THAT THE WINDOW HEAT SWITCH BE TURNED OFF FOR 15 SEC; THEN BACK ON. IF THE EICAS MSG PERSISTS; POWER SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE ASSOCIATED BUS AFTER LNDG. DID THE CONDITION REFER TO THE PRESENCE OF AN EICAS MSG WITH THE SWITCH ON OR OFF? HE STATED THAT THE AIRLINE IS CONTACTING THE MANUFACTURER FOR CLARIFICATION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.