37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 752269 |
Time | |
Date | 200709 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : pxr.vortac |
State Reference | AZ |
Altitude | msl single value : 10000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : p50.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Citationjet C525/C526 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level ground : maintenance |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : approach |
Qualification | controller : radar |
Experience | controller radar : 24 controller time certified in position1 : 6 |
ASRS Report | 752269 |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | FAA |
Primary Problem | FAA |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | communication equipment : p50.tracon |
Narrative:
Aircraft X was a phoenix arrival; handed off to me from ZAB sector 42. The aircraft was approximately 5 mi into my airspace; level at 10000 ft and I hadn't established radio communication with him. I transmitted to see if he was on frequency and heard no response so I called the ZAB sector 42 controller and asked him to see if he still had aircraft X on his frequency. While I was on the landline; I heard an aircraft say that aircraft X had heard me and responded; but apparently I hadn't heard him. I got off the landline and transmitted to aircraft X again and this time I heard him. I was on the standby transmitter and receiver; but this frequency (124.1) is notorious for problems on both main and standby. It is common knowledge that there is a 'blind spot' on this frequency right where aircraft X was at the time of the problem. The FAA has done a few things to attempt to rectify the situation; but without success. (They have swapped frequencys a few times with clearance delivery; south departure and south arrival. I think they have also tried changing the power setting.) this frequency problem indirectly contributed to an operational error a few months ago. Not only is there a blind spot in the frequency coverage; but the quality of the receiver is terrible. I think this is a hazardous situation that the FAA needs to address immediately.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: P50 CTLR VOICED CONCERN REGARDING LIMITED RADIO COVERAGE WITH ARR ACFT; A KNOWN ANOMALY NEEDING ATTENTION.
Narrative: ACFT X WAS A PHOENIX ARR; HANDED OFF TO ME FROM ZAB SECTOR 42. THE ACFT WAS APPROX 5 MI INTO MY AIRSPACE; LEVEL AT 10000 FT AND I HADN'T ESTABLISHED RADIO COM WITH HIM. I XMITTED TO SEE IF HE WAS ON FREQ AND HEARD NO RESPONSE SO I CALLED THE ZAB SECTOR 42 CTLR AND ASKED HIM TO SEE IF HE STILL HAD ACFT X ON HIS FREQ. WHILE I WAS ON THE LANDLINE; I HEARD AN ACFT SAY THAT ACFT X HAD HEARD ME AND RESPONDED; BUT APPARENTLY I HADN'T HEARD HIM. I GOT OFF THE LANDLINE AND XMITTED TO ACFT X AGAIN AND THIS TIME I HEARD HIM. I WAS ON THE STANDBY XMITTER AND RECEIVER; BUT THIS FREQ (124.1) IS NOTORIOUS FOR PROBS ON BOTH MAIN AND STANDBY. IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT THERE IS A 'BLIND SPOT' ON THIS FREQ RIGHT WHERE ACFT X WAS AT THE TIME OF THE PROB. THE FAA HAS DONE A FEW THINGS TO ATTEMPT TO RECTIFY THE SITUATION; BUT WITHOUT SUCCESS. (THEY HAVE SWAPPED FREQS A FEW TIMES WITH CLRNC DELIVERY; S DEP AND S ARR. I THINK THEY HAVE ALSO TRIED CHANGING THE PWR SETTING.) THIS FREQ PROB INDIRECTLY CONTRIBUTED TO AN OPERROR A FEW MONTHS AGO. NOT ONLY IS THERE A BLIND SPOT IN THE FREQ COVERAGE; BUT THE QUALITY OF THE RECEIVER IS TERRIBLE. I THINK THIS IS A HAZARDOUS SITUATION THAT THE FAA NEEDS TO ADDRESS IMMEDIATELY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.